Parental origin was added by assigning a parent to each of the 10 simulated abnormalities, evaluating the heterozygous SNPs for information content, and reflecting the BAF about the 0.5 axis of any informative SNP which was randomly indicating contribution from the opposite parent.
Figure 3 shows the residuals obtained from the predicted values and those obtained by experiment were randomly distributed, indicating that there was no systematic error in the predictions.
Taking into account duplicate probes and probes that are not associated with a gene symbol, 8.76 imprinted genes could be expected in the first 3000 probes if the imprinted genes were randomly distributed indicating a 1.83-fold [16/8.76] enrichment in the TOP3000 (X2 = 5.904; p = 0.0151).
Examination of 20 cases, which were selected randomly, indicated that 16 cases showed a higher expression level of Trib3 protein in cancerous regions compared with normal regions, whereas the remaining four cases showed no difference between normal and cancerous regions.
The 95th percentile classifier accuracy when the stimulus labels were randomly assigned is indicated by dotted lines.
Out of the 16 microarray data sets, 10 were randomly selected for training indicated with the symbol T in Table 2.
To reduce the set of considered secondary data sources to the ones that are relevant across multiple cancer types and usable for multiple outcomes, 10 out of 16 microarray data sets were randomly selected for training, indicated in Table 2.
Focus groups and interview participants were randomly selected from those indicating on the questionnaire a willingness to participate further in the study.
Moreover, by deleting or importing additional interactions at different percentages in the angiogenesis network, we found that the NIMS outputs were quite stable even when 50% of the edges were randomly removed or added, indicating that NIMS is insensitive to both incompleteness and noise regarding the background network.
Another possibility is that the offset phases of simultaneously recorded neurons are randomly distributed, indicating that the neurons do not fire synchronously, but rather in a dispersed and independent manner.
