Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
To establish model's statistical robustness, 15% of reported groundwater potential data were randomly classified into validation group as suggested by Neuhäuser et al. 2012.
Seven days after injury, rats were randomly classified into three groups, and each group received injections of PBS, F3, and F3.VEGF cells, respectively.
Participants were randomly classified into two groups.
Two hundred cervical scrapings were randomly classified into a training set (n = 111) and testing set (n = 89).
Patients were randomly classified into two groups, group I having RV apical pacing and group II having RV septal pacing.
18 mice were randomly classified into three groups (6 per group), including negative group, model group, and treatment group.
Similar(45)
The training set was randomly classified for training, validation, and test sets in order to avoid overfitting, and then networks were trained.
As genes that are expressed at very low levels are usually below the noise threshold and thus, will be randomly classified as up- or down-regulated, it is more appropriate to evaluate agreement among the genes that are expressed above a noise level.
The accuracy of class prediction using two genes on the Training Sample Set was then estimated through cross-validation (10% of samples were randomly extracted and classified based on the discriminant function calculated on the remaining cases).
From these datasets, smaller classified bases were randomly generated, with approximately 1, 3, 5, 10, 20 and (50~%) of the original dataset, where each class should have at least one sample.
The accessions that were not classified into botanical varieties were randomly distributed in the genetic groups.
More suggestions(15)
were arbitrarily classified
were easily classified
were randomly mutated
were randomly picked
were randomly numbered
were randomly presented
were randomly drawn
were randomly distributed
were randomly interleaved
were randomly sampled
were randomly arranged
were randomly chosen
were randomly selected
were randomly allocated
were randomly divided
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com