Exact(3)
After the spleen MDSCs were isolated, 30 BALB/c mice were randomized divided into three groups which were CLP+MDSCs (day3),CLP+MDSCs (day 10), CLP+saline whereas MDSCs were adoptive transferred into these mice respectively.
After the tumours had reached a mean diameter of about 8-10 micemicarryinging MIA-PaCa2 xenografts were randomized divided into groups of 5-6 animals each and treatment was started.
The mice whose peripheral white blood cells under the 30% of normal level were randomized divided into three groups, negative control group subjected with saline, positive group with 0.25 mg/kg G-CSF, and test group administered with 0.58 mg/kg 3DHSA-G-CSF (as G-CSF equivalent of 0.25 mg/kg).
Similar(57)
RCTs, also known as randomized clinical trials, is a prospective study to test the efficacy and effectiveness of certain treatment or protective measures after comparing the results of the treatment group with those of the control group, thus the subjects involved in the study being randomized divided into two groups [2].
Trials of all conditions were randomized and then divided in blocks of 32 trials between which participants could take a break.
Twenty-four mongrel dogs with septic shock induced by lipopolysaccharides (LPS) were randomized to be divided into two groups (HES group and RS group).
Both positive and negative datasets were randomized 1000 times and divided into three parts, each having nearly equal number of proteins.
Each zone was divided into four neighborhoods that were randomized to the four treatment arms.
Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive 20 sessions of either UFOV training of visual processing speed, divided attention, and selective attention or traditional computerized visuoperception retraining.
Fifteen ICUs were randomized to two groups, which were studied over a twelve month period and divided into three study phases.
The studies were small and preliminary, and none were randomized, double-blind trials.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com