were omitted from

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were omitted from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been left out or excluded from a particular context or document. Example: "Several important details were omitted from the final report, leading to confusion among the team."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Cells without clear MTOC identification were omitted from the quantification.

Nature

Minimum punishment provisions were omitted from subsection (c).

Cornell University

These were omitted from the respective analyses.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Non-playing minutes were omitted from the analysis.

Sports Medicine - Open

Important costs and consequences were omitted from the evaluations.

Health Economics Review

Areas of clouds and shadows were omitted from the analysis.

Carbon Balance and Management

[Note: E-G were omitted from the release].

Huffington Post

Context and details were omitted from the leaked affidavit.

Huffington Post

For obvious reasons, these were omitted from the film.

Wikipedia

(Two books were omitted from the study for insufficient information).

Los Angeles Times

Sentences that did not yield a pro or con reference were omitted from our analysis.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were omitted from" to clearly indicate that something has been intentionally left out of a particular context, analysis, or document for a specific reason.

Common error

Avoid using "were omitted from" when an active voice construction would be more direct and concise. For example, instead of "These details were omitted from the report", consider "The report omitted these details."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were omitted from" functions as part of the passive voice construction, indicating that something was intentionally left out or excluded. Ludwig AI confirms this usage is common across various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

78%

News & Media

13%

Academia

4%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were omitted from" is a common and grammatically sound passive voice construction used to indicate that certain elements have been intentionally excluded. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used across different contexts, particularly in scientific and academic writing where precision is crucial. While alternatives like "were excluded from" or "were left out of" exist, understanding the nuance of each can improve clarity and impact. When using this phrase, ensure that it aligns with the overall tone and style of your writing, and consider whether an active voice construction might be more effective in conveying your message.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were excluded from

Similar meaning, emphasizes a more deliberate act of keeping something out.

were removed from

Implies a more active removal, often for a specific reason.

were left out of

More informal, suggests accidental or unintentional exclusion.

were not included in

Neutral phrasing, simply stating absence from a group.

were excluded from consideration

Explicitly specifies the exclusion relates to a decision-making process.

were taken out of

Indicates extraction from a larger set.

were disregarded from

Focuses on ignoring something, rather than physically removing it.

were absent from

Highlights the lack of presence, rather than an action of removal.

were dispensed with from

Implies something was deemed unnecessary or unimportant.

were passed over from

Suggests a conscious decision to skip or overlook something.

FAQs

How do I use "were omitted from" in a sentence?

Use "were omitted from" to indicate that certain elements were intentionally left out or excluded from something. For example, "Certain sections were omitted from the final report due to confidentiality."

What's a more formal alternative to "were omitted from"?

A more formal alternative is "were excluded from", which conveys a similar meaning but with a slightly elevated tone.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were omitted from"?

While "were omitted from" is in the passive voice, consider whether using the active voice would make your writing more direct. For example, instead of "These details were omitted from the analysis", you could write "The analysis omitted these details."

What's the difference between "were omitted from" and "were missing from"?

"Were omitted from" implies a deliberate act of leaving something out, while "were missing from" suggests that something is absent, regardless of whether it was intentional.