Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"were not statistically significant" is correct and usable in written English.
For example, "The results of our correlation analysis were not statistically significant."
Exact(60)
These were not statistically significant.
The differences between the groups were not statistically significant.
Those three-monthly figures were not statistically significant.
The changes in the other states were not statistically significant.
Other hypothesized relationships were not statistically significant.
These findings were not statistically significant, however.
Yet, differences were not statistically significant.
However, the results were not statistically significant.
Other secondary outcomes were not statistically significant.
These differences, however, were not statistically significant.
Other organizational characteristics were not statistically significant.
More suggestions(21)
for gentamicin were not statistically significant
were not numerically significant
were not statically significant
observed not statistically significant
were not statistically important
were not significantly significant
were not statistically noticeable
were not statistical significant
becoming not statistically significant
years not statistically significant
support not statistically significant
well not statistically significant
were no statistically significant
considered not statistically significant
become not statistically significant
weren't statistically significant
wasn't statistically significant
do not represent statistically significant
became not statistically significant
were not statistically different
were not material
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com