were included as

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were included as" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to items or individuals that have been incorporated into a group or list. Example: "The participants in the study were included as part of the research findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Assorted other late and administrative fees were included as well.

The Guardian - Money

Three non-ZinCo roofs were included, as well.

Ecological Processes

The Libertarian and Independent candidates were included as well.

Huffington Post

These costs were included as well.

British Medical Journal

Fifteen healthy volunteers were included as controls.

International Journal of Psychophysiology

Several simulation results were included as follows.

Nanoscale Research Letters

Septic patients were included as controls.

Annals of Intensive Care

ATCC strains of P. aeruginosa were included as positive controls.

Molecular and Cellular Probes

Total 100 healthy subjects were included as the control group.

Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research

Goal difficulty, gender, and age were included as control variables.

Journal of Environmental Psychology

Monocultures of each species were included as controls.

Aquaculture

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were included as", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being added to or considered a part of. For example, "The additional data points were included as supplementary information."

Common error

Avoid using "were included as" when referring to a single item. The correct form for singular subjects is "was included as". For example, instead of "The document were included as an appendix", use "The document was included as an appendix".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were included as" functions as a passive construction indicating that certain items or entities have been incorporated or considered as part of a larger group, list, or category. Ludwig shows examples across various domains where this phrase is used to denote inclusion.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were included as" is a grammatically sound and very commonly used expression to indicate the inclusion of multiple items within a group or category. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and broad applicability. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, its neutral register allows it to be used across diverse writing styles. Remember to use "was included as" for singular subjects and ensure clarity in denoting what is being included. Alternatives such as "were incorporated into" and "were considered part of" offer similar meanings with slight contextual variations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were incorporated into

Focuses on the action of integrating something into a larger whole.

were integrated within

Highlights the action of blending something into a larger whole.

were considered part of

Emphasizes the aspect of being regarded as belonging to something.

were listed among

Highlights the presence of something in a catalog or inventory.

were classified under

Focuses on the categorization of something.

were featured within

Suggests a prominent or highlighted inclusion.

were comprised within

Indicates that something is a component of a larger entity.

were counted among

Emphasizes that something is part of a numerical total.

were understood as being

Highlights that something is understood or interpreted in a specific way.

were reckoned as part of

Indicates that something is regarded as a component of something larger.

FAQs

How can I use "were included as" in a sentence?

Use "were included as" to indicate that multiple items or individuals have been incorporated into a group or category. For example, "The test results were included as part of the final report."

What's a good alternative to "were included as"?

You can use alternatives like "were incorporated into", "were considered part of", or "were listed among" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was included as" instead of "were included as"?

Yes, "was included as" is correct when referring to a singular subject, whereas "were included as" is used for plural subjects. For example, "The study was included as evidence" vs. "The studies were included as evidence."

When should I use "were included as" versus other similar phrases?

Use "were included as" when you want to emphasize the act of adding something to a group or list. Consider using alternatives like "were featured within" if you want to highlight their prominence, or "were classified under" if you are focusing on categorization.