Suggestions(1)
Exact(1)
However three attitudinal predictors were identified; preference for a highly 'mutualistic' relationship between patient and doctor [ 51], a holistic approach to health and a belief that individual behaviour affects health.
Similar(59)
Positive correlations were identified between the preference a female developed for the song-paired chamber and female nesting and dominance behaviors observed prior to conditioning (indices of the motivation to breed).
Recurrent patterns were identified in each preference group.
Specific sub-populations were targeted in seven studies: elderly non-institutionalised women [ 54], women in a rural setting [ 41], patients in the community [ 55], working class men [ 43], young women stroke survivors [ 56] and US war veterans [ 47, 52].> Fifteen coded categories were identified in the preference elicitation studies (Table 4).
Preferred stimuli were identified via formal reinforcer preference assessments, and compliance, latency to compliance, and task completion time were measured.
Five groups of stakeholders with different preferences were identified to define five scenarios of sustainability preferences.
Four main themes concerning preferences for place of death were identified: the nature of preferences; how they were identified; how they were recorded; and how they were achieved.
The duration and amount of bleeding were significantly reduced following both office and inpatient treatment, and no differences were identified according to treatment preference.
The neural substrates of individual sound perception preference were identified in the functional and morphological lateralization of the auditory cortex (AC), particularly the relative size, gyrification and shape of the Heschl's gyrus (HG) [1], [3].
Qualitatively the sequences with both G->A and C->T transitions were identified while the same preference for 5′GpC was observed and a weaker 3′ bias for CpR (Supplementary Figure 1B).
Choice based preferences were identified by having the respondent click on their preferred one.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com