were going to clash

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were going to clash" is not correct in written English; it should be "we're going to clash." You can use it to indicate that two parties or ideas are likely to come into conflict or disagreement in the future.
Example: "Given our differing opinions on the project, we're going to clash during the meeting."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"We are going to clash, we are going to debate things". "It's very easy to develop a groupthink in a company," Gupta said.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

I didn't want to wear anything that was going to clash with her.

The New York Times - Magazine

"If they keep them, we're going to clash," he said.

The New York Times

But that certainly is going to clash with their P.R. image".

The New York Times

Republicans' tax plans are going to clash headfirst with President Trump's anti-China, anti-trade-deficit rhetoric.

The Washington Post

"Me and him are going to clash, and when it happens, it'll be big," said Gatlin.

The Guardian - Sport

If NHS England is going to be pushing for more staff in isolation from financial reality, it is going to clash with NHS Improvement.

The Guardian

Or it maybe simply be further proof that Berlin and Paris are going to clash over banking union and fiscal union, to little reward.

The Guardian - Business

"But so is the ambition and behavior of Saddam Hussein, because sooner or later, the ambitions of Saddam Hussein and the interests of the United States are going to clash".

The New York Times

"I'm an alpha male so if there's alpha males in there we're going to clash but hopefully we can have some harmony," he said on his way in.

Independent

And a word about choosing a date: remember this will be in your diary for the rest of your life: so if you choose June, beware that every four years it is going to clash with the World Cup.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

To avoid confusion, carefully proofread to differentiate "were" (past tense) from "we're" (we are), which is necessary for the intended meaning.

Common error

Avoid using "were" when you intend to use the contraction "we're". "Were" is the past tense of "be", while "we're" is a contraction of "we are". Using "were" instead of "we're" creates a grammatical error.

Linguistic Context

The phrase, when corrected to "we're going to clash", functions as a predictive statement, indicating an expectation of future conflict or disagreement. It uses the future tense construction to forecast a likely scenario.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were going to clash" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "we're going to clash", which uses the contraction of "we are". This phrase indicates an anticipation of future conflict or disagreement. As Ludwig AI's analysis suggests, the correct grammatical form should always be used to ensure clarity and accuracy in communication. Common errors include misusing "were" instead of "we're", so proofreading is essential. Synonyms like "we're likely to conflict" or "we're heading for a showdown" can be used depending on the desired level of formality and intensity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we're likely to conflict

Uses 'likely to conflict' to convey a similar idea of potential disagreement.

we're bound to disagree

Indicates a high probability of disagreement.

we're heading for a showdown

Suggests an inevitable confrontation.

we're on a collision course

Emphasizes the inevitability of a conflict.

we anticipate conflict

A more formal way of saying that conflict is expected.

we foresee disagreement

A formal way of saying that disagreement is anticipated.

we expect friction

Suggests minor conflict or tension.

we predict a falling out

Indicates a potential breakdown in a relationship or agreement.

we'll probably argue

A straightforward statement of potential disagreement.

we're set to quarrel

Suggests a tendency or readiness to argue.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "going to clash" in a sentence?

The correct way to use it is with the contraction "we're" (we are), like this: "we're going to clash". Ensure you use the correct form to avoid grammatical errors.

What does "we're going to clash" mean?

It means that two or more people or entities are likely to have a disagreement or conflict in the future. It indicates a high probability of opposition or confrontation.

Are there any synonyms for "we're going to clash"?

Yes, you can use alternatives such as "we're likely to conflict", "we're bound to disagree", or "we're heading for a showdown" depending on the context.

What is the difference between "were going to clash" and "we're going to clash"?

"Were going to clash" is grammatically incorrect. "We're going to clash" (using the contraction of "we are") is the correct form. "Were" is the past tense of the verb "to be", and it doesn't fit in this context.