were followed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were followed with" is not correct in standard written English; it should be "were followed by." You can use it when describing an action that comes after another action, typically in a sequence of events.
Example: "The presentation was well received, and it was followed by a lively discussion."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Five subjects were followed with serial scans following their initial surgery.

Brain

These were followed with the kind of deconstructed pieces the designer has become known for.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

These remarks were followed with animadversions against B beyond scope of discussion.

The New Yorker

The patients were followed with periodic examinations over three years to see how many would develop recurrences.

The New York Times

Many allegations were followed with promises of retribution to whoever started the post.

The New York Times

Many items on the list were followed with a pointed reference to a competing investment bank that already offered that perk.

The New York Times

The three-hour opera's French and English surtitles were followed with rapt concentration by an audience used to concerts lasting an hour.

The Guardian - Music

The microstructure and morphology were followed with SEM and MIP.

Construction and Building Materials

Due to comorbidity the remaining two patients were followed with CT without intervention.

Insights into Imaging

Postoperatively, the children were followed with relevant infectious parameters and cultures.

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Morphological changes were followed with Atomic Force Microscopy (ATM) revealing rough nanostructures of the layers.

Polymer

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "were followed by" instead of "were followed with" to ensure grammatical correctness. "By" is the correct preposition to indicate sequence.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "were followed". The correct preposition to indicate a sequence or consequence is "by". Using "with" creates a grammatically incorrect sentence.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were followed with" functions as a passive verb construction, but it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI indicates that the correct usage is "were followed by".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

65%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "were followed with" appears frequently in various sources, including scientific and news outlets, it is considered grammatically incorrect by Ludwig AI. The correct phrasing to indicate a sequence of events is "were followed by". When writing, ensure you use the correct preposition to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity. It's important to use "by" instead of "with" in such constructions to avoid errors, as demonstrated by the provided examples.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were followed by

Replaces "with" with "by" to correct the grammatical structure for indicating a sequence.

were succeeded by

Emphasizes a sequential replacement or succession of events.

were accompanied by

Highlights that something occurred simultaneously or closely with something else.

came after

A simpler way to indicate a sequence, replacing the passive voice.

ensued after

A more formal way to describe something that followed as a consequence or result.

were preceded by

Changes the focus to what came before, offering an inverse perspective.

were consequent to

Indicates a logical or natural consequence following an event.

resulted from

Focuses on the cause rather than the sequence, showing what the initial event led to.

stemmed from

Similar to "resulted from", but suggests that the following event originated or developed from the first.

followed on from

A variation indicating that the subsequent event is directly linked to and developed from the previous one.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "were followed" in a sentence?

The grammatically correct way is to use "were followed by". For example, "The presentation "was followed by" a Q&A session" is correct, whereas "The presentation were followed with a Q&A session" is incorrect.

What can I use instead of "were followed with"?

Instead of "were followed with", you can use phrases like "were followed by", "were succeeded by", or "were accompanied by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "were followed with" or "were followed by"?

"Were followed by" is the correct grammatical form. "Were followed with" is grammatically incorrect.

Is "were followed with" ever correct?

No, "were followed with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. The correct phrasing to indicate a sequence is "were followed by".