Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
"were expected to have" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to express an expectation or assumption about something that should have been achieved or obtained in the past. Example: The students were expected to have completed their assignments by Friday. In this sentence, it is assumed that the students should have completed their assignments by Friday, but it is not yet known if they actually did. Another example: The package was expected to have arrived yesterday. In this sentence, it is assumed that the package should have arrived yesterday, but it did not and it is unclear why.
Exact(59)
All were expected to have service by today.
Major contributors such as France, Germany and Italy were expected to have priority.
If you were young, you were expected to have a part-time job.
Marriages were arranged; girls were expected to have children in their midteens.
(White dwarfs were expected to have much higher gravitational redshifts than stars like the Sun).
Girls saw the point of study once they were expected to have careers.
IN days of yore, American men were expected to have opinions about drink.
In a past era, youth mentors were expected to have squeaky-clean records.
Your job wasn't kept open for you: you were expected to have a nice little leaving party and go.
With all rallies canceled, the antiflu measures were expected to have an immediate impact on the campaign for Ukraine's presidency.
The hospitals with lighter workloads and more qualified nurses were expected to have 30% lower surgical death rates.
More suggestions(19)
were suggested to have
were suspected to have
were projected to have
were predicted to have
were perceived to have
were likely to have
were thrilled to have
were recorded to have
were expected to perform
were believed to have
were found to have
were demonstrated to have
were designated to have
were blessed to have
were expected to pay
were expected to implement
were expected to occur
were expected to deliver
were expected to receive
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com