Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were expected for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were expected for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to convey anticipation or prediction regarding an event or outcome, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "The results of the experiment were expected for next week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Delays of 20 minutes were expected for this morning.

News & Media

The New York Times

Until last week, better things were expected for 2002.

News & Media

The New York Times

About 35,000 fans were expected for each day of the concert, according to the organizer.

News & Media

The New York Times

Thousands were expected for Fourth of July inner-tube rides down the Guadalupe.

News & Media

The New York Times

Donald and Melania Trump were expected for coffee, and he had run out of time.

News & Media

The New Yorker

The Meteorological Office said heavy but localised storms were expected for the next few days.

News & Media

Independent

ON Wednesday, 200 people were expected for dinner, but the heat wasn't working so the opening was canceled.

Earlier today, Pocket-lint noted that "massive delays" were expected for multitasking apps.

News & Media

TechCrunch

These results were expected for the same reasons stated in the previous scenario.

So the CNPs and CNSs were expected for the application of fluorescent and electrochemical detection.

Corresponding effects were expected for explicit affective attitudes, but imagery was not expected to influence explicit instrumental attitudes.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When expressing anticipation, use more grammatically sound alternatives such as "were anticipated for" or "were projected for" to maintain clarity and credibility in formal writing.

Common error

Avoid using "for" after "were expected" when indicating what is being anticipated. Instead, restructure the sentence to use alternatives like "anticipated" or "projected" to maintain correct grammatical structure.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

3.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were expected for" functions to indicate anticipation or prediction. Although it is commonly used, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Its usage aims to convey that something was anticipated to happen or be in a specific place.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "were expected for" is frequently encountered across various contexts, including news and scientific publications, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. Therefore, it is advisable to use more accurate alternatives such as "were anticipated for" or "were projected for" to ensure clarity and grammatical correctness. Although common, adhering to proper grammar enhances the credibility and professionalism of your writing. When in doubt, opt for alternatives that convey the intended meaning without compromising grammatical standards.

FAQs

How can I correctly use the idea of something being anticipated?

Instead of using "were expected for", try alternatives like "were anticipated for" or "were projected for" to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Is it ever correct to use "were expected for" in formal writing?

While frequently used, "were expected for" is not grammatically sound. Alternatives like "were intended for" or "were designated for" are more appropriate in formal contexts.

What's a better way to phrase something when you're talking about plans?

Use phrases like "were planned for" or "were scheduled for" rather than "were expected for" for better clarity.

Which is more accurate, "were expected for" or "were anticipated for"?

"Were anticipated for" is grammatically more accurate. It clearly conveys that something was looked forward to, while "were expected for" can be vague and grammatically incorrect.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

3.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: