were evident

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were evident" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is clearly or obviously present or noticeable. Example: The effects of climate change were evident in the extreme weather patterns and rising sea levels.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

54 human-written examples

Its doubts were evident.

The Guardian

But the aims were evident.

The Economist

Cracks were evident, in hindsight.

The New York Times - Sports

No police cars were evident.

The New Yorker

The challenges were evident yesterday.

The New York Times

The effects of the training were evident.

The New Yorker

Still, hints of continuing tensions were evident.

The New York Times

The worries among some Chinese were evident.

The New York Times

Both sides were evident that morning.

The New York Times - Sports

Divisions were evident among voters today.

The Guardian

Signs of Taliban boldness were evident everywhere.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "were evident" when you want to state that something is easily noticeable or obvious based on the available information or observation. It's suitable for describing situations where the evidence is clear and supports a particular conclusion.

Common error

While "were evident" is generally acceptable, avoid overuse in overly formal or academic writing where more precise or nuanced language might be preferred. Consider alternatives like "were demonstrated" or "were indicative of" for greater sophistication.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were evident" functions as a linking verb with an adjective, connecting the subject to a state of being easily perceived or understood. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. The examples illustrate its role in describing observable conditions or outcomes.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

30%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

2%

Academia

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were evident" is a versatile and frequently used expression to indicate that something is easily noticeable or understood. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it's grammatically sound and appears across various contexts, particularly in news and scientific writing. When using "were evident", ensure the subject is plural, and consider more nuanced alternatives like "were apparent" or "were obvious" depending on the context. Be mindful of overuse in overly formal settings, opting for more precise language when appropriate. Remember that while "were evident" is generally safe, precision is always key.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were apparent

Replaces "evident" with "apparent", suggesting something is easily seen or understood.

were obvious

Substitutes "evident" with "obvious", implying something is very easy to notice or understand.

were clear

Uses "clear" instead of "evident", indicating something is easily perceived or understood without confusion.

were noticeable

Replaces "evident" with "noticeable", focusing on the ease with which something can be observed.

were visible

Substitutes "evident" with "visible", highlighting that something can be seen.

were manifest

Uses "manifest" instead of "evident", suggesting something is clearly revealed or displayed.

were palpable

Replaces "evident" with "palpable", indicating something is so intense it can almost be physically felt.

could be seen

Changes the structure to a more active voice, emphasizing the act of observing.

were plain to see

Adds emphasis to the ease of seeing or understanding something.

were easily observed

Emphasizes the simplicity of observing something.

FAQs

How can I use "were evident" in a sentence?

Use "were evident" to indicate that something was easily seen or understood. For example, "The improvements /s/were+evident after the new policy was implemented".

What are some alternatives to "were evident"?

You can use alternatives such as "were apparent", "were obvious", or "were clear" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "were evident" or "was evident"?

"Were evident" is used with plural subjects, while "was evident" is used with singular subjects. For example, "The problems /s/were+evident" (plural) versus "The problem /s/was+evident" (singular).

What is the difference between "were evident" and "were obvious"?

While both suggest something is easily noticeable, "were obvious" implies something is very easy to understand, whereas "were evident" suggests the evidence for something is readily available and clear.