Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(8)
All patients were evaluable for survival.
All 51 patients were evaluable for survival.
Twenty patients were evaluable for survival analysis.
All 69 patients were evaluable for survival analyses.
115 patients were evaluable for survival (4 patients were lost to follow-up).
Thirty-three patients were evaluable for all study endpoints, while all 40 included patients were evaluable for survival endpoints.
Similar(52)
55 patients (PP) were evaluable for response and survival, and 41/55 for SSTR.
Of the 56 intent-to-treat patients with advanced inoperable NSCLC, enrolled in the study between October 2003 and February 2005, 52 (92.9%) were evaluable for toxicity and survival.
Patients who fully met the entry criteria and who received and completed at least two cycles of therapy were evaluable for response and survival according to the protocol.
Sixty-one patients (ITT) were included into this trial; 55 (PP) were evaluable for treatment response and survival, and 41/55 were evaluable for SSTR.
Nineteen patients were evaluable for the outcome measures of survival, progression-free survival, and response (see Table 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com