Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(59)
Results: all patients were evaluable for response and toxicity (intention to treat analysis).
Results: Ten patients were enrolled, and 9 were evaluable for response.
All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 (78%) were evaluable for response.
The median number of administrations of cetuximab was 14. Sixty-seven patients were evaluable for response.
Fourteen patients were evaluable for response.
Of 40 patients accrued to the study, 32 were evaluable for response assessment.
Forty-three patients were enrolled; 41 were evaluable for response, including 25 patients with HGG and 16 patients with BSG.
Nineteen of 21 patients were evaluable for response; short-term stable disease was observed in 5 patients.
In 37/39 and 12/39 patients, respectively, thoracic and non-thoracic lesions were evaluable for response assessment.
Twenty-four patients were enrolled and 23 were evaluable for response.
All 30 patients were evaluable for response.
More suggestions(11)
were evaluable for efficacy
were evaluable for toxicity
were evaluable for safety
were evaluable for tumor
were evaluable for analysis
were evaluable for survival
were evaluable for meta-analysis
were evaluable for tolerability
were evaluable for outcome
were evaluable for activity
were evaluable for assessment
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com