Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Therefore, eight patients were evaluable for outcome with intermittent chemotherapy.
Similar(59)
Therefore, 21 patients were evaluable for clinical outcome after surgery.
Twenty-four patients were evaluable for clinical outcome analysis; in 37.5%, the PFS ratio was ≥1.3.
Nineteen patients were evaluable for the outcome measures of survival, progression-free survival, and response (see Table 2).
QI-6 was defined by dividing the number of patients with clinical success at end of therapy or, if the patient remained on antibiotics, on Day 14 by the total who were evaluable for clinical outcome.
All patients were evaluable for safety analysis and efficacy evaluation.
All patients were evaluable for safety.
14 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis.
All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 31 (78%) were evaluable for response.
infusion every 4 weeks) and were evaluable for toxicity and 18 (15 NSCLC, 3 SCLC) were evaluable for efficacy.
Seventy-nine patients were evaluable for safety, and data from 70 patients were used for efficacy analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com