Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(7)
Seventy-six patients were evaluable for analysis.
117 patients (52 participants, 65 nonparticipants) were evaluable for analysis.
Of these patients, only 68% were evaluable for analysis.
Sixty-six of 87 randomized patients were evaluable for analysis.
On the contrary, 99% of eligible patients in the study presented by Paik and colleagues were evaluable for analysis.
No selection of the material was done and 228 specimens (228/240, 95%) were evaluable for analysis.
Similar(53)
All patients were evaluable for safety analysis and efficacy evaluation.
14 patients were evaluable for pharmacokinetic analysis.
Twenty patients were evaluable for survival analysis.
All patients were evaluable for safety analysis.
All patients were evaluable for this analysis.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com