Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(25)
12 14262727 Five of six placebo-controlled trials 12 14 21–23 stated that they were double blind, but only two reported the blinding method in detail.
28 Of the six remaining studies, four were double blind, one was a single blind, and one was a non-blinded randomised controlled trial.
Five were double blind (Engler et al., 2004; Balzer et al., 2008; Crews et al., 2008; Davison et al., 2008; Muniyappa et al., 2008) and only one study (Balzer et al., 2008) described an adequate method of sequence generation.
All behavioral tests were double blind and performed during the first few hours of the animals' light cycle (light on at 8 AM).
†All trials were double blind.
All trials were double blind, including the six extension trials.
Similar(35)
From the initial sample of 343 citations, 4 controlled clinical trials for primary prevention of PPS were finally included (894 patients); 3 studies were double-blind randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
All these trials were double-blind, randomized crossover trials.
Of these challenges 9% were double-blind trials.
All the six trials (Table 1) were double-blind.
All submissions were double-blind reviewed by at least two experts.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com