Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
Ninety-four female blue fox cubs were distributed into two groups with either handling or no handling.
Twenty-nine entire does were distributed into two groups (Group M, n = 14; Group C, n = 15).
Patients were distributed into two groups: 'high CRP' (≥75 mg/L) and 'low CRP' (<75 mg/L) at ICU discharge.
They were distributed into two groups considering the indication to extraction due to periodontal disease (45 teeth) and prosthetic purposes without periodontal disease (45 teeth).
Patients were distributed into two groups depending on their Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at ICU admission (SOFA < 8, n = 122 and SOFA ≥ 8, n = 156), and the association between immunoglobulin levels at ICU admission with mortality was studied in each group by Kaplan Meier and multivariate logistic regression analysis.
The students were distributed into two groups of proposers and responders.
Similar(41)
Tumor-bearing animals were distributed into four groups: BT474 treated and control, HR6 treated and control.
Forty adult female cats (3.0 ± 0.32 kg; 1.8 ± 0.7 years) were distributed into four groups.
Twenty-four dairyned dairy goats (7 weeks pregnant) were distributed into six groups with four goats in each group.
Milk was collected from eight multiparous Holstein and four multiparous Brown Swiss cows that were distributed into four groups and arranged in a randomized complete block design with four 4-wk periods.
Crossbred dairy cows (n = 25) received a CIDR for seven days and GnRH on Day 0. Seven days later 150 μg of PGF was given and the progesterone device was removed, and 24 h later cows were distributed into three groups to receive: 1) 2 mL of Saline (Control Group, n = 25), 2) 150 μg of PGF PGF Groupp, n = 25) or 3) 1 mg of ECP ECP Groupp, n = 23).
More suggestions(15)
were randomised into two groups
were split into two groups
were distributed into two pools
were herded into two groups
were distributed into two dimensions
were randomized into two groups
were categorised into two groups
were separated into two groups
were distributed into two CCs
were distributed into two components
were distributed into two arms
were distributed into two subscales
were sorted into two groups
were distributed into two wells
were distributed into two clades
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com