Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
were developed for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"were developed for" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when describing something that has been created to fulfil a specific purpose. For example, "New technology solutions were developed for improving online productivity."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Encyclopedias
Wiki
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
Both were developed for Last.fm by UK-based developed Toby Beresford Applications Ltd.
News & Media
They were developed for that purpose".
News & Media
Several techniques were developed for taking wagons down inclines.
Encyclopedias
New techniques were developed for fixing enemy gun positions.
Encyclopedias
The concepts were developed for Alfa Romeo's centennial.
News & Media
"No new TB treatments or tests were developed for more than 50 years.
News & Media
Simpler systems were developed for identifying and tracking livestock and other goods in transit.
News & Media
The first electric-light bulbs were developed for use on board battleships.
News & Media
"Price lists" were developed for in-game items, based on detailed statistical analyses of their properties.
News & Media
And vessels of elaborate designs, varying little from those of today, were developed for various purposes.
News & Media
Several scenarios were developed for this purpose.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "were developed for", ensure the sentence clearly states what was developed and its intended purpose. This improves clarity and avoids ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "were developed for" when an active voice is more appropriate. For example, instead of "The program were developed for students", consider "Researchers developed the program for students" for clarity and directness.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "were developed for" functions as a passive construction indicating purpose or intended use. It describes what something was created to achieve, as confirmed by Ludwig examples where new technologies or methods are brought into existence with a specific goal in mind.
Frequent in
Science
44%
News & Media
39%
Wiki
8%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Encyclopedias
3%
Reference
1%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "were developed for" is a common and grammatically correct construction used to express the intended purpose behind the creation or modification of something. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts. Predominantly found in scientific and news-related content, this phrase effectively conveys the reason a particular product, system, or strategy was brought into existence. While grammatically sound, it's important to consider whether an active voice might provide more clarity and directness in certain situations. Alternatives such as "were created for", "were designed for", or "were intended for" can also be used to add variety to your writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
were created for
Replaces 'developed' with 'created', emphasizing the act of bringing something into existence for a specific reason.
were designed for
Substitutes 'developed' with 'designed', highlighting the planning and intention in the creation process.
were intended for
Changes 'developed' to 'intended', focusing on the purpose or goal for which something was created.
were made for
Replaces 'developed' with 'made', a more general term for creation or construction.
were built for
Uses 'built' instead of 'developed', emphasizing the construction or assembly aspect.
were constructed for
Substitutes 'developed' with 'constructed', focusing on a more formal or complex building process.
were engineered for
Replaces 'developed' with 'engineered', highlighting the technical or scientific aspect of the creation.
were fashioned for
Changes 'developed' to 'fashioned', suggesting a more artistic or crafted creation.
were adapted for
Uses 'adapted' instead of 'developed', emphasizing the modification of something for a new purpose.
were purposed for
Substitutes 'developed' with 'purposed', focusing specifically on the assigned use.
FAQs
How can I use "were developed for" in a sentence?
The phrase "were developed for" indicates the purpose or intended use of something. For example, "These guidelines were developed for ensuring data privacy".
What are some alternatives to "were developed for"?
You can use alternatives like "were created for", "were designed for", or "were intended for" depending on the specific context.
Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were developed for"?
While "were developed for" is grammatically correct in the passive voice, using the active voice can often make your writing clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "The system were developed for security", try "Engineers developed the system for security".
What's the difference between "were developed for" and "were used for"?
"Were developed for" indicates the intended purpose during creation, while "were used for" describes the actual application, which might differ. Something can be developed for one reason and then "be used for" another.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested