Sentence examples for were critiqued for from inspiring English sources

In the 1970s and 1980s, researchers sought to develop explanatory models of course planning to help designers create and improve degree programs (e.g., Mayhew and Ford [1971]), though these early efforts were critiqued for positing an overly linear and simplistic account of faculty practice that likely did not exist in real-world settings (Conrad and Pratt [1983]).

Before use, the data extraction forms were critiqued for face validity by a panel of methodologists experienced in systematic reviews and CDSS.

The estimates of diabetes prevalence reported in this paper are believed to be more realistic compared with the estimates reported by the IDF and the Global prevalence of diabetes estimates which were critiqued for under estimating the prevalence of diabetes, probably as a result of using only demographic trends and urbanisation as a proxy for diabetes future incidence.

"I've been critiqued for being sentimental and sincere and wearing my heart on my sleeve," he says.

The new design was critiqued for making Sonic's legs longer than they've ever been – it must be so that he can have one foot in our distant past and the other one who knows where.

Studies matching groups on demographic covariates alone are critiqued for lacking baseline achievement variables (Farran and Lipsey 2015).

However, existing whole-spine patient-reported outcomes have been critiqued for clinimetric limitations, including concerns with practicality.

In both cases, Gibson's direct realism is critiqued for disregarding a 'higher' human level of cognition.

The indices such as MSE, RMSE have been critiqued for being unbounded and asymmetric [30] while the AC is found to highly sensitive to outlier.

Although cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is the preferred treatment method for anxiety disorders, it is underutilized and has been critiqued for being too verbal or abstract.

Claims of gender advantage by journalists and trade book authors are critiqued for their lack of objectivity and lack of empirical rigor.