Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
We were correct with Haren.
After viewing the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol based label, 82%, 36%, and 82% of those who self-assessed that the drug was appropriate for their use were correct with respect to the age, lipid, and risk-factor criteria, respectively.
Again, predictions were correct with varying levels of confidence.
All of the type strain sequences analyzed using RIDOM were correct with 100% similarity.
The results of this suggested 8 out of 10 ortholog assignments were correct with RBH whilst Homologene put the genes into different orthologous groups.
Overall, 39.9% of the pictures were correct with regard to all criteria evaluated; 68.6% of all those displaying nurses, and 11.3% of those displaying doctors.
Similar(53)
p-values were corrected with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing.
The 0.64 channel data were corrected with our atmospheric correction system and the sky observation data.
In the case of potential multiple comparisons, the p-values were corrected with the Bonferroni correction.
For potential multiple comparisons, the p-values were corrected with the Bonferroni correction.
Mortality rates were corrected with Abbott's correction formula [ 16].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com