were considered as

USAGE SUMMARY

'were considered as' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to express that something was seen in a certain way or thought of in a certain way. Example: The actions of the protestors were considered as a direct violation of the town's regulations.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

kOther data were considered as well.

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training

DASH-scores <15 were considered as good.

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

HER2 3+ tumours were considered as positive.

BMC Cancer

Otherwise, the results were considered as different.

British Medical Journal

Documents not found were considered as lost.

Global Health Action

P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered as significant.

Nature

P values < 0.05 were considered as significant.

Nature

All premature discontinuations were considered as failure.

Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique

P values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Nature

Remaining sites were considered as weakly active (weak splice sites).

Nature

Values of p < 0.05 were considered as significant.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

In formal writing, consider stronger verbs like "deemed", "regarded", or "classified" instead of "considered" to add more precision and impact to your sentences. Remember to choose the verb that best reflects the specific nuance you want to convey.

Common error

Avoid unnecessary passive voice constructions that weaken your writing. While "were considered as" is grammatically correct, overuse can lead to wordy and indirect sentences. Rewriting the sentence in active voice can often improve clarity and conciseness. Example: Instead of "The results were considered as significant by the researchers", try "The researchers considered the results significant."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were considered as" functions as a passive construction, indicating how something was perceived, evaluated, or classified. Ludwig examples demonstrate its use in scientific and formal contexts to present findings and interpretations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Formal & Business

3%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were considered as" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed passive construction. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's suitable for expressing how something was perceived or evaluated. Predominantly found in scientific and formal writing, it's crucial to ensure clarity by providing context on who or what did the considering. While acceptable, remember to explore active voice alternatives for more direct prose. Steer clear of redundancy in passive constructions. Common alternatives include "were regarded as", "were deemed as" and "were viewed as". Overall, wield "were considered as" thoughtfully, recognizing its formal tone and potential for more concise expressions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were regarded as

Replaces "considered" with "regarded", emphasizing the act of viewing or thinking about something in a specific way. This alternative maintains a high degree of semantic equivalence.

were deemed as

Substitutes "considered" with "deemed", suggesting a more formal or authoritative judgment. It implies that a decision or assessment has been made.

were viewed as

Emphasizes the act of perceiving or seeing something in a particular light. It is more about observation than formal evaluation.

were seen as

A more informal way of saying "were viewed as", highlighting a general perception.

were recognized as

Highlights the acknowledgement or acceptance of something for what it is. It implies a degree of understanding or awareness.

were understood as

Focuses on the interpretation or comprehension of something. It suggests a cognitive understanding of the matter.

were interpreted as

Implies that a specific meaning or significance was assigned to something based on certain criteria or context.

were classified as

Indicates that items were grouped or categorized based on shared characteristics or defined criteria.

were labeled as

Focuses on naming or designating something with a specific term or description, often for identification purposes.

were known as

Indicates a common or established name or designation that is widely recognized.

FAQs

How can I use "were considered as" in a sentence?

You can use "were considered as" to indicate how something was perceived or thought of in the past. For example, "The changes "were considered as an improvement" to the existing system".

What are some alternatives to "were considered as"?

Some alternatives include "were regarded as", "were deemed as", and "were viewed as". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "were considered as"?

While "were considered as" is grammatically correct in passive voice, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct and concise. Consider rewriting sentences to use the active voice when appropriate. For instance, instead of "The proposals "were considered as unrealistic" by the committee," try "The committee considered the proposals unrealistic."

In what contexts is "were considered as" most appropriate?

The phrase "were considered as" is often used in formal and scientific writing to describe how certain findings, results, or observations were interpreted or classified. It is particularly common when detailing methodological approaches or presenting conclusions based on analysis.