Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Results were compared using an unpaired, one-tailed t test.
Categorical data were compared using an unpaired Student's t test.
Differences between groups were compared using an ANOVA, p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Examinees' scores for questions measuring local and global listening comprehension were compared using an ANCOVA test.
The different solutions were compared using an approach based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP).
In order to answer this question, the six behavioral means (BM) were compared using an ANOVA for repeated measures.
Hospital and intensive care unit length of stay and IV enalaprilat doses were compared using an unpaired t test.
The length variables (BCB, APDLC and APDMC) in the various subgroups were compared using an analysis of variance (ANOVA).
The resolution and signal to noise ratio of EPR imaging and T1-weighted MRI were compared using an identical phantom.
The 2-FAM and 3-FAM designs were compared using an equal number of groups (96 groups).
Variables were compared using an ANOVA, including genotype, treatment and time of study as factors.
More suggestions(15)
were evaluated using an
were fabricated using an
were determined using an
were performed using an
were viewed using an
were detected using an
were shot using an
were controlled using an
were examined using an
were obtained using an
were observed using an
were generated using an
were tested using an
were selected using an
were collected using an
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com