Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(60)
Both systems were compared regarding to the seed spacing uniformity.
Control and downward transplanted mesocosms were compared regarding aboveground phytomass, phytodiversity, and species composition.
These four groups were compared regarding reversal of opioid signs/symptoms and development of withdrawal-syndrome.
Various groups were compared regarding the amount of tissue generation, vascularization, and cellular proliferation.
Nine grape varieties cultivated in organic and conventional systems were compared regarding the carotenoids, total polyphenols and antioxidant activity.
Differently deposited amino functionalized surfaces were compared regarding their physico-chemical surface properties in connection with cell biological response.
In a pre-post-design, effects of the two training conditions were compared regarding several outcome measures.
The FOUR score and the GCS were compared regarding their predictive value for successful extubation at 14 days after intubation as a primary outcome measure.
Each form of scenarios was analyzed over time and the different forms of scenarios were compared regarding their structure and content.
Studies were compared regarding designs, primary and secondary efficacy parameters, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (A1C), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), incidence of hypoglycemia, and other safety assessments.
A wide range of solid phases for SPE (solid-phase extraction) (n = 14) and HPLC (n = 9) were compared regarding the chromatographic retention of acrylamide.
More suggestions(15)
were assessed regarding
were superior regarding
were issued regarding
were analyzed regarding
were obtained regarding
were given regarding
were pronounced regarding
were rated regarding
were applied regarding
were observed regarding
were discussed regarding
were made regarding
were reported regarding
were done regarding
were balanced regarding
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com