Suggestions(2)
Exact(60)
Both angles were compared in terms of reliability, reproducibility, and precision.
The two groups were compared in terms of mean age, sex, body weight and ASA class.
The two algorithms were compared in terms of both performance and complexity.
The resulting models were compared in terms of correlation and MAE with observed values.
In this study, both methods of fixation were compared in terms of outcomes and complications.
'Researchers', 'Researcher-Users' and 'Users' were compared in terms of their personal goals.
Their performances in energy consumption were compared in terms of reboiler duty and total equivalent work.
The performances of the methods were compared in terms of average run length criteria.
Blocks of questions corresponding to ID, WHODASII, MIDAS and PH9 were compared in terms of correlations.
The test results were compared in terms of test parameters, concrete temperature and compressive strength.
The four methods were compared in terms of convergence, accuracy and computation time.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com