Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
After that, the mapped data could be classified with fewer features and their classification results were compared by utilizing two different classifiers including nearest neighbor classification (KNNC) and naive bayes classifier (NBC).
Similar(59)
Htt levels were compared by chemiluminescence densitometry.
Proportions were compared by Chi-square analysis.
Two groups were compared by t-test.
Group means were compared by factorial ANOVA.
Nonfunctionalization is defined by b = 0, d > 10; dosage balance by b < 0, 0 < c < 1, d = − f, λ(t 0.02 < 0.1; neofunctionalization by b > 0, 0 < c < 1, d > 0, f > 0; and subfunctionalization by b > 0, c > 1, d > 0, f > 0. Models have different numbers of parameters utilized and are compared by their likelihoods and Akaike information criterion (AIC) values.
Comforters are compared by fill power.
The results in the control and the viral infection group were analyzed and compared by utilizing the Unpaired Student t Test and the Mann-Whitney Nonparametric Test.
Data from samples analyzed by Mascot were compared with ProteomeDiscoverer software (Thermo Scientific) utilizing a cutoff score of 40 and a requirement of two peptides per protein.
Experiments utilizing all configurations (10 or 30 ms electron transfer period and preceded or followed by UVPD) were compared based on several metrics.
Carbon sources besides glucose that were found experimentally to be utilized by P. ingrahamii [ 24] were compared with the list of enzyme orthologs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com