were characterized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were characterized" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the defining features or qualities of something in the past. Example: "The events of the 20th century were characterized by rapid technological advancements and significant social changes."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Meanwhile, feudal systems were characterized by redistribution.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Many visits were characterized by long stretches of silence.

The New Yorker

Scaffolds were characterized morphologically.

Materials Letters

These compounds were characterized spectroscopically.

Biochemical Engineering Journal

The prepared catalysts were characterized electrochemically.

Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Both isomers were characterized through spectroscopic analysis.

Chemistry Central Journal

The copolymers were characterized by FTIR.

Chemistry Central Journal

Immobilized polysaccharides were characterized by infrared spectroscopy.

Chemistry Central Journal

Finally, cobalt oxide nanoparticles were characterized.

Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry

The scavenging effects were characterized by EPR.

Heritage Science

The prepared samples were characterized by SEM.

Journal of Nanostructure in Chemistry

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were characterized", ensure the subject and the characteristics you are describing are clearly and specifically defined to enhance clarity and avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "were characterized" with overly broad or subjective descriptions. Instead, provide concrete details and specific attributes to create a more informative and impactful statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were characterized" functions as a passive verb phrase. It describes the state of a subject having been defined or distinguished by certain characteristics. This is supported by examples in Ludwig, which demonstrate its use across various domains.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

10%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "were characterized" is a versatile and grammatically sound expression used to describe the defining features or qualities of something in the past. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's appropriate for use in various contexts, notably science, news, and encyclopedic content. While common, ensure specific and detailed descriptions accompany the phrase to avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives such as "were defined by" or "were marked by" for nuanced expression. By following these guidelines, writers can effectively employ "were characterized" to convey clear and informative descriptions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were defined by

Emphasizes the defining aspects or boundaries of something.

were marked by

Highlights notable or significant features or events.

were distinguished by

Focuses on unique or distinctive qualities.

were known for

Highlights the qualities or features that something is famous or recognized for.

were typified by

Focuses on representative examples or common attributes.

were featured by

Indicates that something prominently displayed specific characteristics.

were exemplified by

Emphasizes how something serves as a clear example of specific traits.

were highlighted by

Indicates that certain characteristics were particularly noticeable or emphasized.

were demonstrated by

Focuses on how certain qualities were shown or made evident.

were embodied by

Suggests that something is a tangible representation of specific qualities.

FAQs

How can I use "were characterized" in a sentence?

Use "were characterized" to describe the notable qualities or features of something in the past. For example: "The 1920s were characterized by economic prosperity and social change."

What are some alternatives to using "were characterized"?

You can use alternatives like "were defined by", "were marked by", or "were known for" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it better to use "were characterized by" or "were defined by"?

Both "were characterized by" and "were defined by" are correct, but "were defined by" ("were defined by") emphasizes essential or limiting aspects, while "were characterized by" focuses on typical or noticeable features.

What's the difference between "were characterized by" and "were distinguished by"?

"Were characterized by" refers to general attributes, while "were distinguished by" ("were distinguished by") highlights unique or differentiating qualities that set something apart.