Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(23)
The remaining papers were appraised using relevant appraisal checklists for the type of study under consideration, following which 16 papers were excluded.
Because all studies were qualitative, the overall methodological quality of those publications classified as original research (n = 5) [ 29– 33] were appraised using the CASP tool for qualitative study appraisal [ 21].
Articles reporting on the tools reviewed by Sutton et al 1 were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) critical appraisal tool for cohort studies 17 (see Table 2 for CASP scores).
Twelve publications were appraised using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Research Evidence Appraisal Tool.
Eligible studies were appraised using defined criteria.
Most guidelines were appraised using AGREE II (103, 75.2%).
Similar(37)
The methodological quality of the studies was appraised using the "appraisal of randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials" developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute.
The quality of included cohort studies was appraised using the standard critical appraisal questions developed by the Centre for Clinical Effectiveness.
The quality of the 24 studies was appraised using a scale adapted from the 'Newcastle/Ottawa Scale (NOS)' 33 (the appraisal standard of NOS is shown in online supplementary appendix A).
The company is appraised using fair-market value, a feasibility study is usually performed beforehand, and the selling owner typically sells ownership in stages over time.
Each citation was appraised using screening tools designed and tested a priori.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com