Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
All sequences were annotated as above.
Among 159 first defibrillation shocks, 38.4% were annotated as successful and 61.6% were annotated as unsuccessful according to the adopted definition.
Some names were crossed out with Vietnam dates; some were annotated as natural-cause eliminations.
Questions asking immediate facts were annotated as "behavior-1," whereas questions whose answers involved inferences of facts were annotated as "behavior-2".
As such, molecules 15-19 were annotated as either di-CQA or CQA glycosides.
Along with "emphasis", some of the utterances were annotated as "excited".
Two genes, LOC_Os06g39740 and LOC_Os06g39750, were annotated as "response to cold" by gene ontology (GO) analysis.
SNPs were annotated as genic and intergenic based on positional information from the genome.
Questions like "What is the function of chloroplast membranes?" were annotated as function questions.
Numerical values in the tables were annotated as New if they were not provided in the assignment task sheet.
Of the DEG, 60 were associated with transcription regulation and 18 genes were annotated as meiosis-related genes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com