Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

were analyzed for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were analyzed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to describe the completion of an examination, generally in the context of a scientific study or experiment. For example: The samples collected during the study were analyzed for bacteria levels.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

At least 10,000 cells were analyzed for each sample.

Science & Research

Nature

Three random fields were analyzed for each chamber.

Science & Research

Nature

Reaction times were analyzed for the learning phase only.

Science & Research

Nature

ABSITE results were analyzed for associations with VARK preferences.

Changes in exam performance were analyzed for significance.

Salaries were analyzed for general surgery and 7 subspecialties.

Aspirin frequency groups were analyzed for risk of aneurysmal hemorrhage.

Scores were analyzed for interrater reliability and cohorts compared.

The boards were analyzed for thermal conductivity.

Blood samples were analyzed for prolactin concentrations.

Blood samples were analyzed for BUN.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were analyzed for", ensure the subject being analyzed is clearly defined. Also, specify the criteria or components for which the analysis was conducted to provide context and clarity.

Common error

Avoid stating only that something "were analyzed" without specifying what it was analyzed for. Always indicate the parameters, components, or qualities examined to provide a complete and informative statement.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were analyzed for" functions as a passive verb phrase. It indicates that a subject has undergone a process of examination to identify specific attributes or components. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is a correct and usable element in written English, frequently found in scientific and technical texts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

Academia

20%

News & Media

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "were analyzed for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive verb phrase. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It serves to describe a systematic examination process, typically in formal, scientific, or academic contexts. To ensure clarity, always specify the parameters or qualities being examined. Common contexts include science, academia, and news media. The phrase communicates the completion of a detailed analysis, providing valuable information about the subject's characteristics.

FAQs

What does "were analyzed for" mean?

The phrase "were analyzed for" means that a subject has undergone a detailed examination to identify specific characteristics, components, or properties. It's commonly used in scientific, academic, and technical contexts to describe a process of investigation.

How can I use "were analyzed for" in a sentence?

You can use "were analyzed for" to describe how data, samples, or other subjects were examined. For example: "The blood samples "were analyzed for prolactin concentrations"" or "The survey responses "were analyzed for trends"."

What are some alternatives to "were analyzed for"?

Some alternatives include "were examined to determine", "were assessed in relation to", or "were tested to identify", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when using "were analyzed for"?

The passive voice (e.g., "samples were analyzed for contaminants") is often preferred in scientific writing to emphasize the subject of the analysis rather than the actor performing it. The active voice is also correct but shifts the emphasis (e.g., "researchers analyzed samples for contaminants").

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: