were aggregated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "were aggregated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the process of collecting and combining data or information from various sources. Example: "The results of the survey were aggregated to provide a comprehensive overview of customer satisfaction."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

In an earlier version some figures were aggregated in error.

The Guardian

When contacted, the BBC said these were aggregated claims.

Independent

Those opinions were aggregated into a vast (and anonymous) database, the linchpin of the new Deja.com site.

The New York Times

Stool-based tests were aggregated for simplicity.

Health Economics Review

All historical scenarios were aggregated and investigated.

Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy

Data were aggregated by generic medication.

AAPS Open

Scores were aggregated in various ways, when sufficient data existed.

Forbes

Data were aggregated using a random effects model.

Nutrition Research

The raster images for each damage level were aggregated.

Earth, Planets and Space

The baseline measurements were aggregated per person via arithmetic means.

Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training

were aggregated into the residual food group "Others".

Agricultural and Food Economics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "were aggregated", ensure the subject clearly identifies what items or data have been combined. This promotes clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "were aggregated" without specifying the criteria or method used for combining the data. This can lead to confusion and misinterpretation of the results.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "were aggregated" functions as a passive verb phrase, indicating that a subject (e.g., data, results) has undergone the action of being combined or collected. As Ludwig AI suggests, this construction is used to describe a process where individual elements are brought together into a whole.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

63%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

2%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "were aggregated" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe the process of combining data or information. As Ludwig AI confirms, it functions as a passive verb phrase, often used in scientific, news, and formal contexts. To ensure clarity, it's crucial to specify what was combined and the method used. Consider alternatives like "were combined" or "were compiled" for subtle variations in meaning. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "were aggregated" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

were compiled

Focuses on the process of gathering information into a report or collection.

were collected

Emphasizes the act of gathering items or data from various sources.

were combined

Highlights the merging of separate elements into a single unit.

were consolidated

Suggests the unification of separate parts into a stronger, more coherent whole.

were amassed

Implies the accumulation of a large quantity of something.

were integrated

Focuses on combining elements so they work together effectively.

were pooled

Indicates that resources or data were combined for shared use.

were grouped

Highlights the arrangement of items into categories or sets.

were clustered

Suggests a close gathering of similar items.

were accumulated

Emphasizes the gradual increase in quantity over time.

FAQs

How can I use "were aggregated" in a sentence?

The phrase "were aggregated" is used to describe the action of combining multiple items or pieces of data into a single group or total. For example, "The survey results were aggregated to determine overall customer satisfaction."

What are some alternatives to "were aggregated"?

Alternatives to "were aggregated" include "were combined", "were collected", or "were consolidated", depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when describing data aggregation?

The choice between active and passive voice depends on the focus of your sentence. If you want to emphasize the entity performing the aggregation, use the active voice (e.g., "Researchers aggregated the data"). If you want to emphasize the data itself, use the passive voice ("The data were aggregated").

What's the difference between "were aggregated" and "were averaged"?

"Were aggregated" implies a combining of data, while "were averaged" specifically refers to calculating the average value of a set of data. Aggregation is a broader term that can include averaging, but also summing, grouping, or other methods of combining data.