well-argued

USAGE SUMMARY

The word "well-argued" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is the past tense form of the verb "argue" and it means having presented a clear and logical argument. You can use "well-argued" to describe a debate or discussion that was well-supported with evidence and reasoning. For example: - The lawyer's closing statement was well-argued, leaving no room for doubt in the minds of the jurors. - The article was well-argued and provided a thorough analysis of the current political situation. - Despite their differing opinions, the students engaged in a well-argued and respectful debate. - The professor praised the student's essay for its well-argued points and well-cited sources.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

34 human-written examples

In their judgment of the cases the experts could well-argued deviate from the review criteria.

BMC Health Services Research

Many are well-argued, including a lot of the dissents, and make me want to argue back.

The New Yorker

This is well-argued.

The New York Times

It's now a well-argued torrent.

The Guardian - Film

It's an intriguing, well-argued point.

The New York Times - Books

It's a reasonable, well-argued bet.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

24 human-written examples

"I think it's well argued," Chua-Rubenfeld said.

The New Yorker

It would be counter-productive as well, argued Mr Weidmann.

The Economist

His answer was coolly delivered, well argued and coherent.

The Guardian - Opinion

Thomas Sowell's "Affirmative Action Around the World" is a delight: terse, well argued and utterly convincing.

The Economist

(These interpretations are not new, of course, but sensible and well argued).

The Guardian - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "well-argued" to praise the logical and coherent presentation of ideas, especially in formal writing or academic discussions.

Common error

Avoid using "well-argued" solely to acknowledge an argument's structure without indicating whether you agree with its conclusion. It's essential to differentiate between a well-constructed argument and a valid one.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "well-argued" functions primarily as an adjective, typically used to describe a noun (e.g., point, essay, case). It indicates that the noun is characterized by sound reasoning and coherent presentation, according to Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "well-argued" is a commonly used adjective to describe something presented with sound reasoning and coherence. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and showcases its frequent use in News & Media and Science contexts. While it can be used across different registers, it is most effective when praising the structure and logic of an argument rather than simply indicating agreement. Remember to consider alternative phrases like "logically presented" or "soundly reasoned" to add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

cogently presented

Stresses the clarity and persuasiveness of the presentation, comparable to "well-argued" in conveying effectiveness.

compellingly articulated

Focuses on the eloquence and forcefulness of the expression of an argument, moving away from its inherent quality.

soundly reasoned

Highlights the validity of the reasoning behind the argument, similar to "well-argued" but with a stronger focus on the reasoning process.

thoroughly reasoned

Emphasizes the depth and completeness of the reasoning process, shifting focus slightly from the overall argument quality.

effectively reasoned

Focuses on the successful presentation of reasoning, slightly different from the broader assessment of an argument's quality in "well-argued".

rationally defended

Stresses the rationale behind a defense, which can imply good argumentation though it isn't explicit.

convincingly presented

Emphasizes the persuasive nature of the presentation, unlike "well-argued" which highlights the soundness of the reasoning.

substantiated argument

Indicates that the argument has evidence or support, unlike "well-argued" which focuses on the quality of reasoning.

persuasively defended

Highlights the defense of a position or idea, which may imply argumentation but isn't explicitly about the argument's quality.

logically presented

Focuses on the logical structure of the presentation, differing from "well-argued" which emphasizes the quality of the argument itself.

FAQs

How can I use "well-argued" in a sentence?

You can use "well-argued" to describe something, such as an essay, point, or case, that has been presented with clear reasoning and evidence. For example, "The lawyer presented a "well-argued case", making it difficult for the jury to ignore the evidence."

What are some alternatives to "well-argued"?

Some alternatives to "well-argued" include "logically presented", "convincingly presented", or "soundly reasoned". Each alternative offers a slightly different emphasis on the quality of the argument.

Is it appropriate to use "well-argued" in informal conversation?

Yes, "well-argued" is appropriate in both formal and informal contexts. While it carries a slightly more sophisticated tone, its meaning is widely understood and applicable in various discussions.

What does it mean when someone describes an argument as "well-argued"?

When someone describes an argument as "well-argued", they mean that the argument is presented in a logical and coherent manner, with clear reasoning and supporting evidence. It implies that the argument is structured effectively, even if the listener doesn't necessarily agree with the conclusion.