Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(60)
Well spacing d* = 20 in all cases.
Effective producing coefficient and areal sweep efficiency is 0 and the well spacing is limit spacing, and the effective producing coefficient and areal sweep efficiency is 1 and the well spacing is minimal well spacing.
For example, in 5 m well spacing, the recovery factor was 42 % and increased to 49%% for 15 meter well spacing.
The curve of different well patterns, well spacing and effective producing coefficient appears at the inflection point when injection/production well spacing is 236 m.
With these relatively small well spacing (<236m), the main factor that the influence displacement effect is the injection/production well spacing.
However, the optimization tools rarely enforce minimum well spacing constraints during the optimization process.
The improvement in the recovery was attributed to the closer well spacing.
As expected, the results also show that smaller well spacing yields higher gas production.
The optimal well spacing to be used varies with the type of oil in the reservoir.
Uncertainty was also investigated as a function of the plume width relative to well spacing.
The effect of well spacing, solvent composition and injection rate on recovery has been studied.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com