well recognized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "well recognized with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly; the correct preposition should be "by" or "as" instead of "with." Example: "The artist is well recognized by critics for her innovative style."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

15 human-written examples

Goal attack is also well recognized with a high recall of 88.1% as well as a quite good precision of 72%.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

While blockchain was not very well recognized with the wave of Bitcoin, it is getting more and more attention from people in many industries recently.

Financial Innovation

The (200) and (111) lattice planes can be well recognized with measured average lattice spacing of 1.98 and 2.25 Å, corresponding to the standard lattice spacing of 1.91 and 2.20 Å, respectively.

Nanoscale Research Letters

The role of heterogeneous interfaces in improving mechanical properties of polycrystalline aggregates and laminated composites has been well recognized with interface structure being of fundamental importance in designing composites containing multiple interfaces.

Acta Materialia

Sex differences in body fat distribution are well recognized, with males storing more fat in the visceral area than females [23].

Plosone

The Koebner phenomenon is well recognized with psoriatic disease developing at sites of trauma or pressure.

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

45 human-written examples

It is a fact that, both CPT and DCP are well recognized approaches with a rich performance history in the different parts of the globe.

International Journal of Geo-Engineering

Postreptococcal uveitis is a well recognized entity with quite a few descriptions in the literature, but so far no conjunctival involvement has been reported.

BMC Infectious Diseases

The difficulty in defining gene copy number as a predictive biomarker for stratification of patients for targeted therapy is well recognized even with established actionable targets, such as HER2 in breast cancer.

Cancer Medicine

Today, asthma in the elderly is a well recognized condition, with unique features reflecting the coexistence of other diseases, use of multiple respiratory and nonrespiratory drugs, individual responsiveness to treatment, and differences in the perception of symptoms.

Clinical interventions in aging

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the main causes of death worldwide, with well recognized risk factors associated with their development.

Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for precision in formal writing, substitute "well recognized with" with more standard alternatives like "well recognized by" or "well known for" to ensure grammatical correctness.

Common error

A frequent error is using "with" after "well recognized". Ensure you use the correct preposition – typically "by" to indicate who recognizes something or "for" to specify the reason for recognition.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "well recognized with" functions as a descriptive element, aiming to provide additional information or context. However, as Ludwig AI points out, it's not grammatically sound. Instead, other choices are better and are described in the alternatives. Example: well recognized by, widely recognized for.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "well recognized with" appears in some contexts, primarily within scientific literature, it is considered grammatically incorrect. As Ludwig AI indicates, standard English prefers alternatives like ""well recognized by"" or ""well recognized for"", depending on the intended meaning. Therefore, to maintain grammatical accuracy, it's best to avoid "well recognized with" in formal writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

well recognized by

Changes the preposition to indicate recognition by a specific group or standard.

widely recognized for

Uses "widely" for emphasis and changes the preposition to highlight the reason for recognition.

well established in

Indicates something is firmly in place or accepted within a particular field.

commonly associated with

Focuses on the common connections or links to something else.

known to be

A simple way to state a generally accepted fact.

regarded as

Implies a specific opinion or judgment about something.

identified in

Highlights where something has been specifically found or noted.

acknowledged as

Similar to "regarded as" but places more emphasis on formal acceptance.

recognized because of

Highlights the reason or cause of recognition.

well thought-of for

More informal, indicating a positive opinion or appreciation.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically sound alternative to "well recognized with"?

Consider using "well recognized by" or "well recognized for". The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the agent doing the recognizing or the reason for recognition.

Is "well recognized with" grammatically correct in formal English?

No, "well recognized with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Standard usage prefers "well recognized by" or "well recognized for".

How can I use "well recognized" correctly in a sentence?

Use "well recognized by" to indicate who acknowledges something, as in "The theory is "well recognized by" experts". Use "well recognized for" to specify the reason, like "The author is "well recognized for" her insightful analysis".

What's the difference between "well recognized by" and "well recognized for"?

"Well recognized by" emphasizes the source of recognition, while "well recognized for" highlights the attribute or quality that leads to recognition. For example, "The discovery is "well recognized by" the scientific community", versus "The discovery is "well recognized for" its groundbreaking implications".