This study also touches upon the relationship between DCA results when well interference occurs due to various hydraulic fracture hits.
Even though well interference was initially thought to have a limited effect on well performance for the case study presented, the incorporation of well interference parameters in the network design improved production predictions, suggesting that well interference has a more significant impact on well performance than originally anticipated.
After having observed the well interference and interlayer interference phenomenon during the dynamic tracking stage, twenty-four production wells have been relocated and the producing layers for thirty-six production wells have been changed.
Based on production dynamic data of well history, tracer, well interference test and intake profile test, the direction and distribution of fracture horizontally and vertically were figured out by reservoir engineering analysis method.
This approach accounts for the entire production history of the well and the reservoir, and thus reduces the influence of well interference effects on decline curve analysis.
Deciphering the areal extent of land that is influencing the groundwater quality in a particular well is quite difficult, owing to the dynamic nature of the cones of depressions of each well, and well interference.
Close proximity of wells results in well interference effects and unrestricted irrigation causes extreme cones of depression resulting in increased salinity in water which is usually low-brackish to high-brackish to begin with.
CRRT is the response time difference between conflict trials (CT) and neutral trials (NT), divided by NT: The conflict ratio for response time indicates how well interference has been controlled for correct responses.
The oil-water interfaces of prolific wells rise more rapidly than that from the stripper wells, leading to an uneven distribution of internal flow fields and cross-well interferences.
It was shown that inter-well interference during multi-well drainage increases and then begins to stabilize.
The variability in the spatial distribution direction of CBM components, δ13C1 and δD shows that inter-well interference may still be in an early stage or the degree of inter-well interference may be relatively weak.
