Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Similar(60)
The resulting colonies were picked and grown in 96-well deep well plates.> -wrap-foot> NotNot detectable Microscale cultivation and expression in 96-well deep well plates was done according to Weis et al. (2004) with some modifications.
This was done in duplicate to create two sets of six 384-well deep well inoculated diamond plates.
Because of this relatively high and uniform expression level the, 96-well deep well cultivations can be used to screen for mutated enzymes produced by semirational design approaches.
Expression levels of both constructs with the native signal sequence in 96-well deep well cultivations were similar and in the range of 0.3 U mL−1.
All resulting constructs were transformed into P. pastoris strain CBS 7435, cultivated in 96-well deep well plates, and screening for PDH activity (Table 2).
Single colonies from these plates were arrayed into 96-well deep well plates containing 200 μL of LB and 100 μg/mL ampicillin and grown for 18 h at 37 °C while shaking at 250 rpm.
The standard deviation within one group of constructs was always approximately 10%, which shows the uniformity of the 96-well deep well plate screening and proves its suitability for high-throughput screening.
5 μl of each culture was used to inoculate 1 ml of 2 × TY containing 100 μg/ml ampicillin and either 0 μM or 36 μM tetracycline in 96-well deep well blocks.
120 μl of lysate were transferred from pelleted culture blocks into 240 μl 384-well deep well diamond plates containing 90 μl per well 100% isopropanol using a 384-well Hydra pipetting instrument (Robbins Scientific).
After the sixth round of selection, clones from rounds 3 6 were grown overnight in 96-well deep well plates with 2xYT broth supplemented with carbenicillin and M13K07 helper phage (10 iu/mL).
Single colonies were inoculated into 800 μl of LB media containing 50 μg/ml ampicillin in 96-well deep well plates, covered with sterile, breathable film and incubated at 37°C on a shaking platform overnight.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com