Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

welcome for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"welcome for" is not correct in written English.
Instead, you should use "welcome to". For example, "Welcome to our office."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

It is as welcome for Boeing.

News & Media

The New York Times

@Dave35, u r welcome for the appendectomy.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It's a welcome for everyone".

News & Media

The Guardian

You're welcome for that mental image.

"A warmer welcome for international postgraduates?

News & Media

The Guardian

"There was a big welcome for us.

A deserved win is welcome for us.

But the hero's welcome for Shougang soon faded.

News & Media

The New York Times

What do I need a hero's welcome for?

Mourinho, meanwhile, promised a warm welcome for his former player.

Still, the competition is hardly welcome for Pfizer.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use "welcome to" when you want to express that someone is being greeted or received positively. For example, say "Welcome to our city" instead of "Welcome for our city".

Common error

Avoid using "welcome for" as it's grammatically incorrect. The correct preposition to use with "welcome" is usually "to". Incorrect: "A warm welcome for our guests." Correct: "A warm "warm welcome to" our guests."

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "welcome for" functions as a prepositional phrase, often intended to express a greeting or positive reception. However, Ludwig AI identifies that this usage is grammatically incorrect. It is often mistakenly used in contexts where "welcome to" is the correct form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

56%

Science

24%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Social Media

5%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "welcome for" appears frequently in various sources, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms that "welcome to" is the preferred and correct usage for expressing greetings or invitations. Although it's used across different contexts, including news and media, adhering to correct grammar by using "welcome to" will enhance clarity and credibility in writing.

FAQs

How do I properly use "welcome" in a sentence?

The word "welcome" is typically followed by the preposition "to" when greeting someone or something. For example, "welcome to our home" is correct, while "welcome for our home" is not.

What can I say instead of "welcome for"?

Instead of "welcome for", use "welcome to". Other alternatives include "warm reception for" or "cordial greeting for", depending on the context.

Is "welcome for" ever grammatically correct?

In standard English, "welcome for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. "Welcome to" is the standard and accepted usage.

What's the difference between "welcome to" and "welcome for"?

"Welcome to" is the grammatically correct phrase used to greet someone or invite them into a place or situation. "Welcome for" is not a standard or accepted usage in English.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

87%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: