weighted voting

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "weighted voting" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where different votes have different levels of influence or importance, often seen in decision-making processes or organizational governance. Example: "In our committee, we implement a weighted voting system to ensure that larger stakeholders have a proportionate say in the decisions made."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

53 human-written examples

Those recommendations, which would have to go to a public referendum by November 1988, could range from proposing weighted voting to abolishing the board.

The New York Times

Mirski said he is concerned about making New Hampshire the first state to try weighted voting.

Huffington Post

In the case of multiple sequences for one gene, we used weighted voting to determine a single prediction for the gene.

BMC Genomics

Like Xiaomi, Meituan is listed under a new dual-class share structure designed to attract tech companies by allowing them to give weighted voting rights to founders.

TechCrunch

To meet state requirements for town representation, weighted voting would be used in the floatutorial districts, which Democrats also said would meet the federal voting rights requirements.

Huffington Post

When weighted voting is used as a classifier, the probabilistic output is calculated by one-dimensional logistic regression from the prediction strength of weighted voting.

BMC Genomics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

7 human-written examples

It should be noted that application of the following strategy is not limited to weighted-voting.

BMC Genomics

Also, a new combination technique which is based on training-weighted voting is introduced.

Applied Soft Computing

The EOS Referendum system is the mechanism for that signal as it provides token-weighted voting data on specific topics which are proposed from within the community itself.

Forbes

In my view, age-weighted voting would work best if voters are broken down to five key age groups.

Vice

In Australia, age-weighted voting would mean under 35s would control 43percentt of the vote, in contrast to the 27percenttheyey currently hold.

Vice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing voting mechanisms, clearly define how the "weighted voting" system allocates influence. Specify what factors determine the weight assigned to each vote or voter to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid vague references to "weighted voting" without explaining the weighting criteria. Ensure the audience understands the specific rules or formulas used to determine the relative influence of different votes.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "weighted voting" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object in sentences discussing decision-making processes. Ludwig AI shows it describes a specific type of voting system where different votes carry varying levels of influence.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Science

50%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "weighted voting" refers to a voting system where votes are not equal, with some carrying more influence than others. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used across diverse contexts, notably in news, science, and formal settings. When writing about "weighted voting", clearly define the criteria used to assign different weights to votes. Be aware of potential criticisms concerning fairness and equity, as highlighted in the FAQ section.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

weighted ballot

Specifies the ballot itself carries a weight.

variable voting power

Highlights the variability in voting strength.

differential voting

Highlights the different weights assigned to votes.

scaled voting

Emphasizes that the voting power is determined by a scale.

graded voting

Suggests votes are graded to determine impact.

proportional representation

Focuses on aligning representation with the proportion of votes received.

qualified voting

Emphasizes voters need specific qualifications for their vote to count more.

tiered voting system

Indicates different levels or tiers within the voting structure.

plural voting

Implies some voters have more than one vote.

weighted scoring system

Shifts focus from voting to a scoring process where elements are weighted.

FAQs

How does "weighted voting" differ from simple majority voting?

Simple majority voting gives each vote equal weight, while "weighted voting" allocates different levels of influence based on factors like shareholding, population size, or expertise. Therefore in "simple majority voting", every participant's vote counts the same; conversely, some participants' votes in "weighted voting" schemes may be more decisive than others.

In what contexts is "weighted voting" commonly used?

"Weighted voting" is frequently used in corporate governance (shareholder voting), international organizations (like the IMF), and political bodies where representation is not strictly one-person-one-vote.

What are the advantages of using a "weighted voting" system?

Advantages can include giving more say to those with greater stakes, expertise, or responsibility. It can also help protect minority interests or ensure that decisions reflect the relative importance of different stakeholders.

What are some potential disadvantages or criticisms of "weighted voting"?

Criticisms often center on fairness and equity, as it can lead to situations where some individuals or groups have disproportionate power compared to others. It can also be perceived as less democratic than a "one-person-one-vote" system.