Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Conversely, Publishers Weekly considered it "highly readable" and thought it both "cogent and provocative", representing a significant addition to the debate on U.S. foreign policy.
Similar(59)
Entertainment Weekly considers the film superior to Frankenstein.
Smoking status was determined by asking all respondents how often they currently smoked 'cigarettes, cigars, pipes or any other tobacco products' (daily, at least weekly, less often than weekly or not at all); those who smoked any tobacco product at least 'less often than weekly' were considered smokers and were included in our sample.
Publishing a weekly was considered Variety's only option, aside from moving entirely online, and The Reporter has shown that it can work.
Entertainment Weekly Ken Tucker considered the episode "at once in-your-face and under-handed, very clever about its very cynicism".
Erica Futterman of Rolling Stone and Sandra Gonzalez of Entertainment Weekly both considered it to be an improvement from the previous episode.
Acworth told Orlando Weekly he considered ceasing appeals when the mark had initially been rejected by the USPTO.
Writing in the San Francisco Weekly, Erin Browner considered Knowles' cover the "highlight of the night" when she performed it at the start of her US tour.
Writing for Entertainment Weekly, Tom Sinclair considered that while the record was not ground-breaking, "the Foos have found a way to create their own archetype, with an instinctive feel for what constitutes a killer song", and praised "how damn near flawless the tone of the whole set feels".
Mice were palpated weekly and considered tumor bearing if a palpable mammary mass persisted for more than one week.
We acknowledge that our definition of "routine" download and review was conservative, knowing that other studies asked patients to download data weekly or monthly or considered weekly download to be a target.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com