The phrase "weaker students" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to refer to students who do not perform as well as their peers academically. For example, "The teacher provided additional resources for the weaker students to help them keep up with the rest of the class."
This is because real-life molecules can actually be analysed using it, even by weaker students.
In England, it's weaker students who are steered onto the arts track.
The researchers suspect that this may be because weaker students are put off from speculative applications.
This means that comparatively weaker students in less intellectually rigorous programs are the ones preparing to become teachers.
Other critics wonder if one reason test scores have improved is that so many weaker students have simply dropped out.
Attendance is good -- better than in a pure reading program aimed at weaker students in the school -- and the children seem thrilled with the array of activities.
They also stand accused of dumping their weaker students into nearby public schools -- after being paid to educate them -- and screening out disadvantaged and disabled students altogether.
If you pick out academically weaker students for vocational training, you trade those children's chances of getting into university for a higher guarantee of paid employment.
It can stretch the more able students to read extra resources and support weaker students who could draw on the image for support.
Presenting able students with questions they could answer in primary school will only insult their intelligence, while weaker students will become de-motivated.
Others have been accused of generating better scores by screening out the disabled and dumping weaker students back into the public system.
