weak received

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "weak received" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe something that was received in a weak manner, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The feedback was weak received, leaving the team unsure of how to improve."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

However, such a deployment is not suitable for cell-edge users because they have weak received signal power from the base stations (BSs).

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

No learning schemes have a lot of UEs who have weak received power while our proposed Q-learning scheme can serve high throughput to such cell-edge UEs.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Our proposal, the red line of Figure 8, can enhance the throughputs of the UEs who get weak received power such as cell-edge UEs.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

It is highly possible that TSU cannot detect the energy of the weak received PU signal unless special care is undertaken.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

where n denotes the number of UEs that cannot get the radio service because of no spectrum vacancy or weak received power, referred to as outage UEs.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Action b: The UE's bias value Cost n: The number of UEs that cannot get the radio service   because of no spectrum vacancy or weak received power, referred to as outage UEs.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

46 human-written examples

Impact of further UEs In theory, the presence of further UEs does not change the DR threshold of a receiver, since the DR threshold is solely given by the maximal possible difference between strong and weak receive powers but is independent of the number of UEs received.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

With 16:08 remaining, Weaks received a technical foul for plowing into Williams of Duke during a scramble for a loose ball.

The New York Times - Sports

As an example, suppose that two transmitters exist (i.e., s1 and s2) that have the highest and the weakest received signal power level (p1and p2), respectively.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

When the reader queries a tag, the reader-to-reader interference is too strong with respect to the weak signals received from the tag, thus compromising the interrogation.

EURASIP Journal on Embedded Systems

A phenomenon that degrades the service quality of a wireless network is the Near Far (N-F) effect, which occurs when the interference from a user transmitting near the base station overpowers the weaker signal received from a distant user.

Introduction to CDMA Wireless Communications

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "weak received" in formal writing. Opt for clearer and more grammatically correct alternatives like "poorly received" or "weakly received".

Common error

Don't assume that "received" always fits well after "weak". The passive voice can sometimes obscure the intended meaning. Instead, consider active constructions for greater clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "weak received" functions as an adjective-verb combination, but its grammatical structure is questionable. As Ludwig AI points out, it is not a standard or clear way to express the intended meaning.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

11%

Less common in

Wiki

11%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "weak received" appears in some contexts, Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically incorrect and not a recommended usage. Alternatives such as "poorly received", "weakly received", or "low signal strength" are clearer and more grammatically sound options. The phrase's limited and questionable usage suggests it should be avoided in formal writing in favor of more accepted alternatives. The occurrence of this phrase across Science, News & Media, and Formal & Business sources indicates its presence across various domains, but its low frequency highlights the need for more precise and grammatically correct language.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

low signal strength

Directly describes the signal's power level.

weakly received

Uses an adverb to describe the manner in which something was received.

poor reception

A general term for inadequate receiving quality.

poorly received

Emphasizes the negative reaction or lack of acceptance rather than signal strength.

attenuated signal

Refers to a signal that has been reduced in amplitude or intensity.

faintly received

Highlights the low intensity or volume of the received signal.

feeble reception

Uses a more formal term to describe poor receiving quality.

barely audible

Focuses on the inaudibility of the received sound due to weakness.

distorted signal

Focuses on the compromised quality of the signal due to interference or weakness.

unclear transmission

Focuses on the lack of clarity of the received communication.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "weak received"?

Instead of "weak received", consider using alternatives such as "poorly received", "weakly received", or "low signal strength" depending on the specific context.

Is "weak received" grammatically correct?

No, the phrase "weak received" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use phrases like "poorly received" or "weakly received".

How can I use "poorly received" in a sentence?

You can use "poorly received" in a sentence like: "The proposal was "poorly received" by the committee."

What is the difference between "weak received" and "weakly received"?

The phrase "weak received" is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "weakly received", where "weakly" is an adverb modifying the verb "received".