But biogeochemist Jorge Sarmiento of Princeton University says that because carbon measurements in the study varied so widely, the data are "weaker proof [of iron-enhanced carbon sequestration] than I think we would have liked".
Therefore, observed large differences, even if non-significant, represent weaker proof of selection, or any other driving force, but not genetic drift or randomness.
The answer to this question is that although the result is weaker, the proof yields something stronger: any difference in determinants yields a difference in unconditional determinant-induced conditions.
The EPA began the process of rolling back the Clean Power Plan in October and is now workshopping a draft of a rule to replace it with a dramatically weaker alternative — proof of the lasting power of the endangerment finding, which compels the agency to regulate carbon dioxide emissions in some form.
may be able to reap through a litigation claim may not be significant as its claim would be weak without clear proof of accounting misstatements.
Emerson rejects the Unitarian argument that miracles prove the truth of Christianity, not simply because the evidence is weak, but because proof of the sort they envision embodies a mistaken view of the nature of religion: "conversion by miracles is a profanation of the soul".
Then, for each λ ∈ ] 2 d 2 2 ( b − a ) ∥ α ∥ L 1 ( [ a + b 2, b ] ) G ( d ), c 2 2 ( b − a ) ∥ α ∥ L 1 ( [ a, b ] ) G ( c ) [, problem (P1) admits at least two nonnegative weak solutions. Proof Our aim is to apply Corollary 3.1. To this end, we pick c 1 = 0 and c 2 = c.
We have the following result: Theorem 4.3 Under assumptions (1.6 - 1.9 1.6 - 1.9), there exist λ* > 0 such thandfor λ ∈ [λ*, +∞[, the problem (4.8) has atherest onexistk solution. Proof Let g ( u ) = ∑ k = 1 T F ( k, u ( k ) ), then g': W → W is completely continuous and thus, g. is weakly lower semi-continuous.
A 'moderate'weakeak' or 'very weak' level of proof led to the drawing up of an 'optional' recommendation (should probably be done, should probably not be done …).
For example, a contextualist might accept that 'knowledge'-talk is equally appropriate whether one is describing the best achievements of empirical science, or the best achievements of mathematics, while acknowledging that the former rest on weaker standards of proof than the latter.
