Growth generally shows negative allometry.
However, if there is a relative reduction in size, growth is said to show negative allometry.
In the present study, the relationships between the carapace width and weight of H. marsupialis showed negative allometry (b = 2.87).
In the present study, the relationships between carapace width and weight of H. marsupialis showed negative allometry (b = 2.87).
Hartnoll (1982) clarified that if the regression coefficient (b), which defines the type of allometric growth rates, exceeds 1, it gives positive allometry, if equals 1 referring to the isometry, but if it is less than 1 indicating negative allometry.
Hartnoll (1982) clarified that if the regression coefficient (b), which defines the type of allometric growth rates, exceeds 1, it gives positive allometry; if it equals 1, it is referring to the isometry; but if it is less than 1, it is indicating negative allometry.
Du-Preez and Mclachlan (1984) recorded a positive allometric growth rate between these two variables for Ovalipes punctatus, while slight negative allometry in Telmessus cheiragonus and T. acutidens was recorded by Urita (1936).
Unfortunately, at least three of their variables conflate original design with the negative allometry of resharpening, i.e., code specimens for degree and pattern of resharpening experienced (Shott 2008a 148 149).
Du-Preez and Mclachlan (1984) recorded a positive allometric growth rate between these two variables for O. punctatus, while slight negative allometry in Telmessus cheiragonus and Telmessus acutidens was recorded by Urita (1936).
The variables EMPLOYEE and AWARENESS indicate a weak negative correlation.
