Sentence examples for weak interpretations from inspiring English sources

Even though it is not a very common term, in the literature, we sometimes find variants of the expression 'token reduction' (Cartwright 1999: 32ff.; Hooker 1981: part III; Bickle 1998: 223ff).. Token-identity theories perfectly match weak interpretations of theory reduction.

According to a weak interpretation of this hypothesis, language influences thought in such a way that translation and shared understanding are difficult but not impossible.

With regard to weaker interpretations of ATOM, it has been also suggested that similar or even identical accumulators may work simultaneously; for instance, numerosity and duration could be processed independently by two different accumulators before converging in a common system [ 24, 49].

The considerations advanced in the previous paragraph could be given a stronger or a weaker interpretation.

If Clarke is right, Locke (even on the weaker interpretation I am proposing) would be wrong.

The weaker interpretation instead requires merely minimizing inexplicable error on the part of the creature being interpreted, thus allowing for significant deviations from psychological assignments that might be required by the stronger interpretation.

The weakest interpretation of the contract is that the contractual result is simply indicative of the correct answer to the justificatory problem, which itself is simply indicative of the fact that P has N.

A weaker interpretation of the boundary condition (1.5) arises through optimal transportation, in which case Caffarelli [1] proved that the convexity of the target (Omega ^*) suffices for local smoothness of solutions.

The weaker interpretation sees only very basic logical, semantic or conceptual constraints on understanding others and thus what is constitutive of minds which allows for significant variation as one moves further out from these to more substantive principles of practical reasoning and theoretical reasoning, and even more when extending out further to desires and values.

He is good on doctrine and development, clear on explanation but weaker on interpretation.

We can distinguish between weak and strong interpretations of sufficientarianism (see Crisp 2003; Benbaji 2006).