weak information

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "weak information" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe information that lacks strength, reliability, or clarity, often in contexts such as research, analysis, or communication. Example: "The report was based on weak information, leading to questionable conclusions."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

We performed more analyses to assess the sensitivity of the results to different prior distributions representing weak information (i.e. non-informative prior) relative to the trial data, and the results remained robust.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

In those ways, it is more difficult to distinguish weak information from strong noise.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Our algorithms show good balancing performance with fast enough convergence speed in both strong and weak information cases2.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The retrieved image S has a high PSNR=29.62, but it has obviously lost the weak information with SSIM=0.82.

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

Surprisingly, even for the weak information case, proportional allocation scheme could achieve similar performance to that for strong information case.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

In tradition, an affinity graph of superpixels is constructed to strengthen weak information by leveraging the neighbors from the perspective of image-level labels.

Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Several analysts have reduced sales and profit estimates based on weak information-technology spending and the consequences of the terrorist attacks.

Forbes

We speculate that the increased long-range FCD observed in bilateral thalami in this study may be a manifestation of the compensatory effect of thalamic connectivity because of the weaker information processing function of the thalamus in DISC1 Cys-allele carriers compared with Ser homozygotes, with more thalamic functional connectivity required to achieve the same behavioral output.

Brain Structure and Function

This indicates that these are genes with weak marginal information but strong interaction information, which will be overlooked by strategies that only examine individual genes.

BMC Genomics

This conclusion is supported by the relative weak diagnostic information provided by the plasma cytokine data, consistent with conclusions reached at recent a consensus conference [16].

Plosone

Weak health information systems and lack of performance data undermined providers' answerability to their employer and clients, and a lack of effective sanctions undermined supervisors' ability to hold providers accountable for these transgressions.

Health Policy and Planning

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "weak information", clearly state the implications of its weakness on your analysis or conclusions. For instance, acknowledge the limitations of the data and suggest further investigation.

Common error

Avoid drawing definitive conclusions based solely on "weak information". Instead, use it to highlight areas needing further research or to support tentative hypotheses.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "weak information" functions as a noun phrase modifier, where the adjective "weak" describes the quality of the noun "information". It indicates that the information is deficient in some way, such as being unreliable, incomplete, or lacking sufficient evidence. As Ludwig AI shows, it's often contrasted with "strong information".

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "weak information" is a common phrase used to describe data or evidence that is unreliable, incomplete, or insufficient. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability. It appears most frequently in scientific contexts, followed by news and formal writing. When using the phrase, it's important to acknowledge the limitations of the information and avoid overstating conclusions. Alternatives such as "unreliable data" or "tenuous evidence" may be suitable depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unreliable data

Focuses on the lack of trustworthiness of the data.

tenuous evidence

Highlights the fragility and lack of substantiality of the evidence.

flimsy information

Emphasizes the insubstantial and easily dismissible nature of the information.

poor data quality

Indicates a deficiency in the standards and accuracy of the data.

limited insight

Stresses the restricted understanding gained from the information.

insufficient data

Points out the inadequacy of the data for drawing firm conclusions.

questionable intelligence

Casts doubt on the reliability and accuracy of the intelligence gathered.

incomplete knowledge

Highlights the gaps and missing parts in the overall understanding.

sketchy details

Implies a lack of clarity and thoroughness in the information provided.

dubious facts

Raises concerns about the authenticity and accuracy of the stated facts.

FAQs

What does "weak information" mean in research?

In research, "weak information" refers to data or evidence that is not robust or reliable enough to support strong conclusions. It might be preliminary, based on small sample sizes, or come from questionable sources.

How can I identify "weak information"?

To identify "weak information", assess the source's credibility, the sample size, the methodology used, and whether the findings have been replicated. Look for biases, inconsistencies, and limitations in the data.

What can I say instead of "weak information"?

You can use alternatives like "unreliable data", "tenuous evidence", or "flimsy information", depending on the specific context.

Is it acceptable to use "weak information" in a report?

Using "weak information" is acceptable if you acknowledge its limitations and do not overstate its significance. Clearly state that the information is preliminary or requires further validation.