Your English writing platform
Discover Ludwig"weak enough" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe something as being not strongly enough, or not adequately enough. For example: "This soup is not salty enough, it needs to be weak enough for the flavor to come through."
Exact(60)
But not weak enough.
Nor are any of them weak enough to lose it.
Strong enough to hold the connector in place, weak enough to detach if it gets yanked.
But they also want a government weak enough to yield to their interests.
I think it's incredibly addictive if you're weak enough to succumb to it".
The fields applied in the experiment are weak enough to be generated by a small battery.
This depleted team that was supposedly weak enough to lose was too good to be touched.
Was it weak enough that they might have been influenced by an outside source?
"The employment report was weak but probably not weak enough to alter their plans".
Some thought it was a different disease entirely, and others wondered if the virus had become weak enough to ignore.
What a few hours earlier was a blinding star is now weak enough to look at directly.
More suggestions(4)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com