Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
If is a single-valued mapping, then Definition 1.7 (resp., Definitions 1.8 and 1.9) reduces to the concept of weak commutativity (resp., compatibility and weak compatibility) for single-valued mappings due to Sessa [18] (resp., Jungck [11, 12]).
Similar(59)
However, in [15] Abbas and Ilić obtained various common fixed-point and invariant approximation results for such mappings under the assumption of weak compatibility of maps.
To study common fixed points, Jungck [19] initiated the concept of weak compatibility of maps thus: (f_{1}) and (f_{2}) on Y are weakly compatible maps if (f_{1}f_{2}w=f_{2}f_{1}wheneverver (f_{1}w=f_{2}w), for some (win Y).
Finally, using the notion of weak compatibility of the pair together with (1.6), we get.
Now, using the notion of the weak compatibility of the pair and (3.5), we get.
Next, we need to show the weak compatibility of the pair ((f_{1},f_{3})).
By (2.34) and using the weak compatibility of f and T, we obtain fw=fTv=Tfv=Tw.
The main differences are manifested in the weak compatibility of long-term trends.
Hence, weak compatibility remains the minimal commutativity condition for the existence of common fixed point for contractive type mappings.
Hence weak compatibility remains the minimal commutativity condition for the existence of a common fixed point for a contractive pair of maps.
Now, it has been shown that weak compatibility is the minimal noncommuting condition for the existence of common fixed points of contractive type mapping pairs.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com