weak arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "weak arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe points or claims that lack strength, validity, or persuasive power in a discussion or debate. Example: "The speaker's weak arguments failed to convince the audience of his position on the issue."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

35 human-written examples

These are weak arguments.

The New York Times

No probing of weak arguments.

The New Yorker

"Only people with weak arguments need to make up statistics," she said.

The Guardian

Mr. DeMarco's letter rejecting the relief plan made remarkably weak arguments.

The New York Times

Outside a few weak arguments, external conflict is avoided, and internal struggles are largely unexpressed.

The New York Times

Many comments posted on this site in the three months we've been up have been interesting, thoughtful, perceptive, pomposity-puncturing, and ruthlessly exposing of weak arguments.

The Guardian - Opinion

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

23 human-written examples

That is a weak argument.

The New York Times

But Arment responded: "that's a weak argument.

The Guardian - Tech

This would be a weak argument whoever made it.

The Guardian - Opinion

But this is a weak argument against the new rule.

The New York Times

It is a weak argument: cluster bombs are weapons for conventional wars with conventional battlefields.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting a counter-argument, accurately represent the original claim before pointing out its "weak arguments". This strengthens your rebuttal and builds credibility.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the flaws in "weak arguments". A nuanced critique is more persuasive than a sweeping dismissal. Provide specific examples and explain why the arguments are not as strong as they appear.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "weak arguments" functions as a noun phrase where the adjective "weak" modifies the noun "arguments". As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a standard construction used to describe the quality of reasoning or claims. Examples from Ludwig show it in contexts of debates, criticism, and analysis.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

12.5%

Less common in

Wiki

12.5%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "weak arguments" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe claims or reasoning that lack persuasiveness or logical support. As Ludwig AI points out, it fits into a standard noun phrase structure. The term appears frequently in news, media, scientific, and encyclopedic content, reflecting its broad applicability. When using this phrase, it's crucial to provide specific examples to substantiate your criticism and maintain a balanced tone. Alternative phrases like "unconvincing arguments" or "flimsy arguments" can add nuance to your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

unconvincing arguments

Focuses on the lack of persuasiveness in the arguments.

flimsy arguments

Emphasizes the insubstantial nature of the arguments.

tenuous arguments

Highlights the weak connection or basis of the arguments.

poorly supported arguments

Indicates a lack of evidence or justification for the arguments.

unsound reasoning

Shifts focus to the flawed logic behind the arguments.

invalid arguments

Stresses the logical incorrectness of the arguments.

dubious claims

Highlights the questionable nature of the assertions made.

fragile reasoning

Emphasizes the vulnerability and easiness to refute of the arguments.

faulty logic

Points out errors in the logical structure of the arguments.

specious arguments

Highlights that the arguments may seem correct but are actually fallacious.

FAQs

How can I identify "weak arguments"?

Look for logical fallacies, unsubstantiated claims, and lack of supporting evidence. Question assumptions and consider alternative perspectives. Examine the source's credibility and potential biases.

What are some alternatives to saying "weak arguments"?

You can use alternatives like "unconvincing arguments", "flimsy arguments", or "tenuous arguments" depending on the context.

Is it always appropriate to point out "weak arguments"?

While it's important to identify flawed reasoning, consider your audience and the context. In some situations, a more diplomatic approach might be necessary. Focus on constructive criticism rather than simply dismissing the arguments.

What makes an argument "weak"?

An argument is "weak" when it lacks sufficient evidence, relies on faulty logic, or makes unsupported claims. It may also be "weak" if it's based on biased information or fails to address counter-arguments.