we would please

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we would please" is not correct and sounds awkward in written English.
It is not typically used in standard English, as it combines "would" and "please" in a way that does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "We would please appreciate your prompt response" is incorrect; it should be rephrased for clarity.

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Just before a recent advance screening of "The Cabin in the Woods," a friendly publicist asked the assembled bloggers and critics if we would please refrain from disclosing any of the "reveals, surprises and uncredited performances" in the movie we were about to see.

The New York Times

We would please ask that you could please respect their privacy at this very sad time". The woman and two children were all treated for the effects of smoke inhalation.

BBC

Phyllis Schlafly just asked if we would please follow her on Twitter.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

We would say please, please keep away from this water".

The Guardian

But if we vote to leave, that would please Farage, and pleasing Farage must surely be illegal if we've made any progress at all since the thirteenth century.

Independent

Yes, so we could say, "If you would please call George Latimer, he's Calley's lawyer, and he'll be glad to discuss the story with you".

The New Yorker

That would please Towers.

The New York Times - Sports

That would please economists, too.

The Economist

That would please institutional investors.

The Economist

Nothing would please Pope more.

The New Yorker

That would please him.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "we would please" in formal writing. Instead, opt for more conventional and grammatically correct alternatives such as "we would appreciate" or "we kindly request" to ensure clarity and professionalism.

Common error

Don't try to combine "would" and "please" to sound extra polite. This creates an awkward and grammatically incorrect phrase. Instead, use a single, well-established polite phrase like "we would appreciate" or "please consider".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we would please" is not a standard grammatical construction. It appears as an attempt to be polite, but it combines a conditional auxiliary verb ('would') with 'please' in a way that doesn't form a coherent grammatical unit. The Ludwig AI highlights its incorrectness.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "we would please" might seem like a polite construction, it's generally considered grammatically incorrect and awkward in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. Instead of using "we would please", it's better to opt for clearer and more conventional alternatives like "we would appreciate", "we kindly request", or simply using "please" followed by your request. Although there are a few examples of its use in news media, its rarity suggests it should be avoided in formal or professional writing. Using more established phrases ensures clarity and maintains a professional tone.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we would appreciate

Replaces 'please' with 'appreciate' for a more standard polite request.

we kindly request

Uses 'kindly request' instead of 'would please' for a more formal and grammatically sound request.

we would be grateful

Substitutes 'please' with 'be grateful' to express thankfulness for the action.

we respectfully ask

Employs 'respectfully ask' for a more formal and polite tone, avoiding the awkwardness of 'would please'.

we request

A more direct and concise way of making a request, removing the conditional 'would' and the less formal 'please'.

please

Use "please" as a single-word request/command

we urge you to

Replaces the request with an urging, suitable for situations where emphasis is needed.

we encourage you to

Similar to 'urge', but with a softer, more persuasive tone.

we invite you to

Changes the request into an invitation, suitable for offering opportunities.

we suggest you consider

Presents the action as a suggestion for consideration, rather than a direct request.

FAQs

Why is "we would please" considered grammatically incorrect?

The phrase "we would please" is not a standard or grammatically accepted construction in English. It awkwardly combines a conditional verb form ("would") with a word expressing politeness ("please"), resulting in a phrase that lacks a clear and coherent meaning. More appropriate alternatives include phrases like "we would appreciate" or a simple "please".

What can I say instead of "we would please" to sound more polite?

To convey politeness effectively, replace "we would please" with options such as "we would appreciate", "we kindly request", or "we respectfully ask". These alternatives are grammatically correct and commonly used in formal and informal contexts. A simple "please" can also suffice in many situations.

Is there a context where "we would please" is acceptable?

While some instances of "we would please" may appear in informal speech or creative writing, it is generally not considered acceptable in formal or professional communication. It's better to choose clearer, more conventional phrases for making requests or expressing desires.

How does using "we would appreciate" differ from "we would please"?

"We would appreciate" is a standard, polite way to express gratitude in advance for someone's action. In contrast, "we would please" is grammatically unconventional and doesn't clearly convey a request or gratitude. Using "we would appreciate" ensures clarity and adheres to accepted English usage.