we would argue

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "we would argue" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to present a viewpoint or opinion in a discussion or debate context. Example: "In this paper, we would argue that climate change is the most pressing issue of our time."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

We would argue.

The New Yorker

We would argue politics heatedly.

The New York Times

We would argue the opposite," said Mockridge.

The Guardian - Sport

But we would argue it's more risky to do nothing.

Stanford University

To not do that, we would argue, is riskier.

Stanford University

We would argue that much depends on what happens next.

The Economist

"We would argue over every comma," Butterworth said.

The New Yorker

This, we would argue, is a geopolitical mistake.

The Washington Post

We would argue it's a risk too far".

The Guardian

But we would argue that the results are better".

The New York Times

"Even when we would argue or have differences of opinion, he was very steady," she explained.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "we would argue" when you want to present a viewpoint as a considered opinion rather than an absolute fact. This phrasing adds a layer of nuance and invites the reader to consider the argument critically.

Common error

Avoid starting multiple consecutive sentences or paragraphs with "we would argue". Vary your phrasing to maintain reader engagement and avoid sounding repetitive. Consider using synonyms like "we contend" or "in our view" to introduce different facets of your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "we would argue" functions as a modal verb phrase used to introduce a reasoned opinion or viewpoint. It signals that the statement is not presented as an absolute truth, but rather as a considered argument. Ludwig AI validates this usage by showing that it's commonly used to express viewpoints.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

42%

Formal & Business

22%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "we would argue" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to introduce a considered opinion, as validated by Ludwig AI. It is found across diverse contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Formal & Business settings, denoting a neutral to formal register. While the phrase is effective for presenting arguments, overusing it can lead to redundancy. Therefore, varying your phrasing with alternatives like "we contend", "we believe", or ""in our view"" will enhance clarity and maintain reader engagement. Remember, it's about presenting a perspective rather than a hard fact.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

we contend

This option suggests a more formal and assertive stance in presenting an argument.

we maintain

This alternative implies a firm and unwavering belief in the stated position.

we assert

This phrase conveys a strong and confident declaration of a viewpoint.

we submit

This option suggests a more respectful and deferential way of presenting an argument, often used in legal or formal contexts.

we propose

This alternative indicates the presentation of an idea or suggestion for consideration.

we suggest

This phrase offers a more tentative and gentle way of introducing an opinion.

we believe

This option emphasizes a personal conviction or faith in the stated idea.

in our view

This phrase directly indicates a subjective perspective or opinion.

from our perspective

This alternative highlights a specific viewpoint or angle of consideration.

it is our position

This phrase clearly defines a formal stance or official viewpoint on a particular matter.

FAQs

How can I use "we would argue" in a sentence?

You can use "we would argue" to introduce an opinion or viewpoint in a discussion, debate, or written piece. For example, "We would argue that stricter environmental regulations are necessary".

What's a more formal alternative to "we would argue"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "we contend", "we assert", or "we submit" depending on the specific context.

Is it ever incorrect to use "we would argue"?

While generally correct, overusing "we would argue" can make your writing sound repetitive. Strive for variety by using different phrases to introduce your points. See also: "in our view".

What is the difference between "we would argue" and "we argue"?

"We argue" presents a statement as a direct argument. "We would argue" softens the statement, suggesting it is a reasoned opinion rather than an absolute fact.